Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest stationmaster buy cloud host technology Hall
"Parity net" everywhere, robots and real people to help you see, see the report out to let tens of millions of people know "this is the cheapest." Many heavy users now buy more than 10,000 yuan of products, the first thing is to search the Internet, parity. But do you really always want to buy the "best deal" in a lifetime purchase decision?
Sometimes you don't think about price at all, just want to buy the "highest quality" thing?
3 C comparison site to help us than the "best", which cell phone battery the longest, which one notebook computer thinnest, but Valentine's Day, boys can not buy cold 3C to girls? In case I only have half a day to buy, too late to ask Magi ' s Gift, want to which site like parity site, Let me immediately know "which thing is the best"?
TechCrunch yesterday mentioned a website called Insidetrip, and looked very feeling. This site wants to play a fishy fishy Red Sea market, namely Expedia, Orbitz, Travelocity, lowestfare.com, HotWire, CheapTickets, and other ticket-buying sites. The difference is that Insidetrip special emphasis on "quality", that is, the comparison of each airline, airport, aircraft quality, and finally for each purchase option to calculate a 66~95 difference in the "score." With a quality score, you can line up all the options. What's the best ",insidetrip tell you!
Insidetrip What's the "better" thing? Look at this list, it's not a joke. They can calculate the "late rate", "baggage loss rate", even the security screening of the queue time, the leg stretching space, as well as the gate and customs distance, and so on, all are included. Also, I also pay attention to aircraft, machine age and so on.
What is the difference between "Insidetrip" and "quality" of a general website?
That's right. Insidetrip quality, not to ask users to play scores! In fact, many Web 2.0 sites have been in comparison, by the way "quality", but these sites "quality" of the method is mostly rely on the subjective score of the masses. "Quality" itself already has the difficulty of subjective judgment, it has to "qualitative" this thing to "quantify", but the quality of a bowl of beef noodle How to "quantify"?" "If you do it in the way that the masses score, it is not easy to maintain justice, everyone has their own subjective, a love Sichuan flavor to eat a super spicy restaurant, very enjoyable, while spraying fire on one side to give it seven Stars, service quality to the quality of the dishes are all the best; enthusiastic viewers only consider the" Cool "to reveal that there is no time to help the station to consider the final fairness of the issue. Even if some "experts" on the stand for their own personal quality, and good "give", these experts have their own ideas, the stars to the standard is different. In short, the comparison network really has to encourage purchasing power, but the quality, and finally can only be used as a reference, customer habits to see more than a few to make the final decision.
Insidetrip, in fact, from their own pipeline to get a lot of information, many many, will they tidy up, regularly updated. This information is not usually available to passengers, even if they can not be a comparison; Insidetrip uses powerful computer algorithms to help customers quickly compare and then give you a "quality score." In other words, Insidetrip is the "comparison" of the "climb back and then calculus" approach, to play "quality."
Insidetrip This "quality law" for some large scale areas such as "shopping Restaurant", the total number of choices is not enough, so also can not obtain information for detailed appraisal. But for some areas, such as "Purchase Ticket", in fact, only so dozens of aircraft, dozens of airlines, hundreds of airport ... There is not much information to be collected. Just collect these "quality materials" and "add" them to a "score". What other areas can be set up such a scientific approach to "quality" of the site? The customer who is holding the money is waiting for your answer.