Consumer: Mobile Recharge card should not set the expiration date

Xinhua News (reporter Yang Med) Beijing Association today comments on mobile phone prepaid business "Overlord clause", the proposed cancellation of recharge card set validity period and "service due balance" provisions, in the service expires, should be set up a variety of ways to return, allowing consumers free choice. Different face value of the recharge cards are valid, valid from the date of recharge start calculation, such as 50 yuan face value is valid for 90 days, 500 yuan face value is valid for 540 days. At the same time, telecom operators will also stipulate that "if you have not recharge the account during the lockout period, after the lockout valid period, your number will automatically log off, after the number is cancelled, the balance in the account no longer return the user."　　"The City Consumer Association pointed out that the operator unilaterally formulated the" service expired balance "clause, and their own point of view imposed on each other, increased the responsibility of consumers, and the contract law of the legislative principle of the contrary. The provision of "service due balance" is not only a violation of the fair principle stipulated in the Contract law, but also a violation of the legal rights of consumers, and shall be deemed to be "exempt from one's own responsibility, aggravate the other's responsibility, and exclude the other's main rights". This regulation obviously is advantageous to the telecommunication enterprise, has violated the consumer legal control own rights and interests, should be invalid. Telecom operators have no legal basis for the balance, according to the "General rules of civil law", operators should return the balance of the phone to consumers.　　If refused to return, it constitutes a violation of consumer rights. In addition, the "Service due balance" is contrary to the relevant provisions of the government departments. Mii in 2004 and 2007 made it clear: "Mobile phone account balance is owned by users, when the user requirements of the amount in the account to use, communications operators should effectively meet their obligations, to the user to refund the balance in the account." D044 No competition results Jin Jinwei: Originally "Set the validity of the phone bill" There is no reason, the expiration of not refund, the other people's money for their own, it is the robber logic!　　Why is this violation of the Constitution only to the consumer associations to "suggest"?　　Miga (1480129987): Strongly request the cancellation of the validity of the phone call, the number of people who play less, like the elderly at all, the expiration of a recurrent recharge to activate, the vicious circle caused by the accumulation of more.　　Golden Moon (943151676): The validity period of the telephone fee should be forced consumption.　　Friends at the Domestic (371924395): It is recommended to cancel the validity of the bill has been playing for many years, I do not know the telecom operators what year it rains. Chen Zhiguo: Monopoly Monopoly, only I exclusive. Overlord clause, nothing new. Telephone monthly rent, charge Unlimited. A variety of packages, let you be dazzled. Card balance, not in vain.　　Don't hesitate to take your money.　　Windbreaker (564388229): Overlord clause is more than move, which line which industry did not? Jiang has three: seemingly simple services, are so difficult to achieve, can be seen a single big system is more powerful, more overbearing. Without competition, this is the result.