Crown: Compensation shall be suspended by the court

Absrtact: Shenzhen only the crown and the United States Apple's lawsuit around the ipad trademark to the end of the settlement, Apple by the crown in Shenzhen to pay 60 million U.S. dollars compensation in the way to obtain mainland China's trademark. However, the crown in Shenzhen has not been compensated for

Shenzhen's crown and Apple's lawsuit over ipad trademarks ended in a settlement, with Apple acquiring trademark rights in mainland China by paying 60 million of billions of dollars in compensation to Shenzhen. However, the Shenzhen crown did not receive respite from the compensation, but was sued by the lawyers ' team for the allocation of the compensation.

Yesterday, the morning paper reporter won the original Shenzhen, the chairman of Apple lawyers, Guangdong Canton and law firm, senior partner Sho Caiyuan Lawyer's e-mail, the other party confirmed that the Crown has been formally sued Shenzhen, the request of its lawyer fee of 4.8 million U.S. dollars should be a priority.

Prior to this, the Shenzhen crown another deputy lawyer's law firm also sued the crown and filed a temporary seizure of the ipad in China trademark application, to pay its 2.4 million U.S. dollars legal fees.

According to the introduction, Shenzhen only the crown of all debts of about 400 million U.S. dollars, 60 million compensation allocation issues pending.

Application for temporary seizure of ipad logo

Sho Caiyuan introduced that February 2010, the ipad trademark ownership, Apple and Crown Technology (Shenzhen) Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Shenzhen only Crown") dispute, Shenzhen Crown and Canton and law firm Contact, the institute immediately began to put into the case work. December 2010, Beijing and June Venture Management Consulting Co., Ltd. with five-D lawyer, the state-Hao lawyer and other agencies involved in the case.

According to the agreement at that time, the lawyer fees according to the principle of risk agent, only the crown from the Apple side of the benefits of 8% as legal fees, and the first time to pay priority. In this regard, Sho Caiyuan that the broad and team, and June-Hao two rights groups together to make arduous efforts to promote only the crown of the ipad trademark value can be dramatically increased, 60 million U.S. dollars of 8% directly belong to the case plaintiff. As early as Guangdong Kwong and law firm sued Shenzhen only crown, the country Hao law firm partner Shei introduced, the Institute has filed a lawsuit formally to the court, request Shenzhen only the crown in accordance with the agreement of the agency contract to pay 2.4 million U.S. dollars lawyer fees.

Shei said that after the Chinese trademark network, the current ipad in China trademarks in Shenzhen only the crown, belongs to Shenzhen only the crown of assets, so the application for temporary seizure of the court, so that Shenzhen only the crown first to pay the lawyer fees.

Crown: Compensation shall be suspended by the court

At the beginning of this month, Apple and Shenzhen, the crown of the two-year-long rivalry between the ipad in China finally fell, Apple to pay the price of 60 million U.S. dollars with the Shenzhen crown reached a settlement.

Sho Caiyuan said that the value of the ipad's trademark is now not the same as before, and the realization of trademark value comes mainly from litigation value added.

In this respect, Shenzhen only Crown chairman Yang explained that, Apple's 60 million-dollar reconciliation fee is not in the only crown account, but by the court for safekeeping, should be given priority to the reunification of the Crown of creditors, the state-Hao party to ask for legal fees should be applied to the court, rather than directly to the Crown for justice, not to prosecute the crown.

It is understood that, in addition to two law firms suing Shenzhen only the crown for lawyers fees for a total of 7.2 million U.S. dollars, in the entire trademark dispute as the only Crown spokesperson in Shenzhen and June Venture consulting company also said that the crown of Shenzhen should also pay the amount of consultancy fees, and early in the trademark litigation, Shenzhen only the crown has repeatedly been creditors door-to-door bizhai.