Dalian Three Ktv was sentenced to 45,000 yuan in the final award for each song to compensate thousand Yuan

According to Xinhua news agency, Liaoning province Dalian three KTV establishments karaoke copyright infringement case finally results.　　Liaoning Province High People's Court 21st to make final decision: three KTV infringement of the facts set up to each song 1000 yuan compensation standards, to the Chinese audio-visual copyright Collective Management Association of Beijing Sky Language simultaneous Information Technology Co., Ltd. to compensate for the economic losses amounted to more than 45,000 yuan. Earlier this year, Beijing Tian-language simultaneous Information Technology Co., Ltd. to the Dalian Intermediate People's court, said Dalian Emperor Jia Jin bottle Casino, such as three KTV venues without permission, for the purpose of profit, unauthorized in their own song system in the use of its rights to a number of music TV works, a serious infringement of the rights of the Party as a　　To this end, the decree three KTV to stop the infringement, from the library to delete the infringing works; each song compensation for its economic losses and to prevent the other party infringement and reasonable expenditure of the total cost of more than 17,000 yuan. In June this year, Dalian Chinese Academy of the Court identified: as the defendant of Dalian Emperor Jia Jin bottle Casino, such as three KTV venues played by the plaintiff copyright KTV Music TV Works, has constituted infringement, should be compensated.　　To this end, the three accused units immediately stop the screening of KTV music and television works, and 1000 yuan per song to pay the standard, to the plaintiff Beijing sky-language simultaneous Information Technology Co., Ltd. compensation for economic losses amounted to more than 45,000 yuan. After the verdict, Dalian Emperor Jia Jin bottle Casino, such as three KTV venues defy, filed an appeal. Liaoning High Court after the trial found that the original decision to determine the facts clearly, the evidence is accurate, this ruling "dismissed the appeal, upheld the verdict."