Developers make more money in the App store than they do on Android harsh

A http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/32268.html > survey in the UK now shows that over 50% of Google's Android harsh The user chooses a refund within 48 hours after paying for the purchase and downloading the application. The survey also showed that the same application in Apple's App store was only 5%. To this end, we have to admit that the disparity between the numbers is huge. Developers believe the main reason for this difference is that Google's refund policy for Android Harsh makes it easy for users to choose a refund.

In many cases, the user downloads a paid application and, in a 48-hour trial, gets most of the useful information they want from the application, and then chooses to waive the payment. It is reported that developers before entering the android harsh need to sign an agreement with Google, one of the trial and refund agreement to the following: If the application can be previewed, such as ringtones, wallpaper, and so on, users can not refund after purchase. However, if the application is not available for preview, the user can choose a full refund within 48 hours after purchase. This agreement came into force in November 2009. Google's move is designed to protect the interests of users, but it has caused a lot of trouble to developers.

Investigators have visited Android application developers across the UK, and they disagree with Google's approach. "If an application contains a large amount of critical information for the user, and the user can easily access the information within a 48-hour probationary period, this will not help protect developers who have invested a lot of money and manpower to develop applications." "The user protects the interests of consumers and provides a little incentive for developers to create more quality applications." "Google needs to take a serious look at the impact of the Android harsh refund policy on developers, rather than jumping to conclusions." Google must allow users to give developers some feedback on why they want to refund when they choose to refund. Instead of giving users no reason to refund "the developers are also mixed with Google's approach, some think Google's approach helps motivate developers to develop more good applications, because the user's refund will enable them to reflect on the application of the problem and improve.

But more developers are dissatisfied with Google's approach, and the biggest problem for developers is that they lack a feedback when they choose to refund-many developers don't know why their apps are being refunded, so developers can't make improvements to apps. Whether Google's approach will scare away new developers who provide apps for Android is not yet certain. But, to be sure, Google will need to do more research in the future on the Android harsh refund feedback. Because if Google does not change this, Apple can continue to claim that its Apple store is in a more secure trading environment.