Director of biochemical crisis: it's disrespectful to adapt a movie without playing a game.

We've been doing this, or at least we've seen a lot of people doing it. So there is very little success, and even if it succeeds, we all know it's just a fluke.　　"Hollywood has been doing this," says Paul Anderson, director of the biochemistry crisis: the afterlife. Even if we don't know what this is, it doesn't affect the way we adapt it to a movie. In a recent interview with Crispy Gamer, Anderson responded to the movie Maker Mike Newell, the Prince of Persia, admitting that he had not played the Prince of Persia properly. It's as if you hadn't spent the book on a movie before you made it, or if you had not seen the show before you adapted it. I think this is disrespectful to the media, but also to the original material disrespect, and fundamentally impossible to produce a good film. "Even the biochemical crisis: the afterlife did not reach the 335 million dollar box-office receipts of the Prince of Persia, and Anderson still insists:" As a filmmaker, I am completely immersed in the world of biochemical crisis, so even though we choose to tell a slightly different story, and introduced a number of different roles, the film itself and the game is very consistent with the world. You can see what they encounter in the movie and the game, and their costumes. This is undoubtedly done on the basis of respect for the original works. I think the whole movie is full of "biochemical crisis" game feeling, and I think the fans will be able to see. "Although Anderson's theory has gained some recognition, it is clear that he has not made the market a mess, unlike another director, Mila Jovovich, who is faithful to the original and cannot make good films." I'm afraid we've all forgotten some of Anderson's other films, Street Fighter, Super Mario Bros, King of fighting and life or death ...　　And the "biochemistry of the Crisis" movie series.　　To be fair, what else can a plumber do to jump and jump? Still, we have to say that if you love the material you're shooting, you'll get better results, better than no love of material. But we may be sure that making a very attractive story and character can make a good movie better than simply loving it.　　In either case, the last thing we want to say to Hollywood is, please stop making the movie, or why do we have such an article? If you have any other ideas, please let us know. (Digging the shell net)