Discovered SEO Super virus please DZ forum webmaster attention

Discovered SEO super virus. Please DZ forum webmaster attention.

You webmaster:

What would you do if you found that your carefully crafted content was replicated in the past?

What would you do if the content that was copied was much better than the original content on your site in search engine rankings?

What would you do if you found that the station that copied your content was better than what you ranked as a garbage station that was designed to survive by copying other people's content?

What would you do if you clicked on his station and found that it was just a page full of color Qing content and pictures?

I think, this is our each has the sense of justice stationmaster biggest disgrace. is to let us feel very helpless. But, helpless. As a seoer. We began to think. Why do they rank better than our rankings?

We all know that when search engines determine the quality of your site, they will use one of their own data. That's the weight. Each included in the site has a corresponding weight. All the weeks, the weight of the station, natural rankings to be better than and be included in the speed is fast. This is also the search engine to determine http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/18427.html "> Web content original or not a very stupid standard (when their database already has the content of your page, Do you think that your copy is the original in their database? Originally this is not a very important question. But it's because of this "idiot" standard. Created a seemingly simple but for small and medium-sized stationmaster is very powerful SEO virus.

But what kind of virus is this? How big is his power?

I am a station webmaster. I have been struggling to manage the forum for several months (to facilitate research, I posted the Web site.) Please don't scold me ad! thank you. Www.90days.cn/bbs), in Baidu hair-collected-and then plucked hair-a few more after the collection, in 1.5 months ago, officially was k off. In fact, before being k off, I have found this virus, but only with the special SEO friend husband only discussed. The idea was that they were just copying other people's content, then producing the Web page and adding code that spiders couldn't see in the Web page. When others search and click, they jump to a color Qing page. For profit. There is no heart. 1.5 months ago, my small station was finally K. So I asked a bunch of friends to help me analyze my station. Results The opinion has always been that my station optimization is no problem. Since it's not my problem, what exactly is the problem? I've been searching for 1.5 months. No results. Today, a member of the forum to my message that Baidu can find our station. But after clicking in, it is a color Qing website. So Lenovo found a few months ago that the SEO virus. I went to Baidu for a while. Sure enough. Http://www.baidu.com/s?wd=90%BA%F3.%D0%C4%D3%EF Row First station originally is my station content, Baidu Snapshot is also my station. But after clicking in, it will jump to a foreign color Qing website. Through the query data, I learned that this is through a collection of DZ forum archiver source code and generate their own new Web content program to do the station. Since the collection, then their content is not the same as my station content exactly? I took the idea and exchanged it with a few friends. The friends also said that his station was copied. And the copied content is better than his ranking. Even friends have not been included in the Web page, incredibly after being collected, the rankings are very good. So, I began to consider why his page has not been included, we all know, Baidu like the original has come to the point of going mad. So, is it because Baidu likes the original in addition to the small station general weight is relatively low reason? I asked a few friends. Most said there had been such a situation. The net name "freshman" said to me: "I have been deeply hurt by it ... A few keywords all ran to me, and the flow from the archiver all disappeared, estimated loss of more than 1000IP "