Do I have copyright on the Internet?

I accidentally use google search my blog, want to see the search engine on my blog included. Basically most of the search results with the title of the article, the first source is my blog or my Jane book homepage. But when I found the article "The Three realms of Couba," in the first place is actually a blog for everyone to share, at first I thought it was someone wrote and my title the same article, point into a look, this is not my piece? The word is not bad, and the reprint has neither indicated the original link nor noted the author. In the second place, the URL is mp.weixin.qq.com, which I guess is from the micro-public number. Sure enough, by looking at the cache discovery is called the Sunflower Book of the micro-letter public number, neither noted the author nor the original link.

I in Renren the full text reproduced in the log below the message, let the reprint of the author and the source, after a few hours, found that the reprint has added my name and the original link, a little relieved. But relieved, still feel wrong. Because the first 10 pages of Google search results did not find my blog or the source of the book, that is, Google search engine may have put Renren's this article as the original source. No wonder, Renren this article currently has more than 20,000 browsing and 400 times reprinted, should be much larger than my blog traffic, according to Google's algorithm, it thinks Renren is the original source, and may even think that my blog is reproduced (so in search results do not show my blog source). This is the damage to the original, but also cause me unhappy. The same content travels faster on everyone's web, because it's a social network, and the effect is definitely greater than the very small number of independent blogs I have. I can also go to everyone on the Internet to write, but because of the aversion to SNS to open independent blog, and then go back to certainly impossible.

In fact, as long as the reproduction of the full text copy, even if the beginning of the original author and source, for the original author is also a harm. Because if the reprint is operating properly, he can get more attention than the original author or even profit. I am my article its father, but if someone else has robbed my son, even if every person will explain that it is my son, what is the use? His son was still there and brought him some good. Search engines only recognize the data, do not recognize the author. Most readers don't have the habit of getting the original link, and there's no need--since you've seen it here, why go to the original source? Reproduced copy of the full text of the stolen is the value of the original. The best way to do this is to indicate the source and link of the reference, not the full text or large segment of replication.

What can I do? After each article, please note that the text is prohibited. This is of course futile, at the end of the computer, anyone who wants to replicate needs only to move the mouse or to replicate without any restrictions. Unless I write or write poorly, being stolen and plagiarized is almost inevitable. Fortunately copy reproduced articles and Rob Son is not the same, I wrote something Still on my blog, and the network is open and free, there will always be someone who is the original creator. Besides, the process of giving birth to a son has been happy.

Copyright is a very fragile word on the web, because the person who infringes it hardly has to pay any price. So it's doomed, once you start writing on the Internet, you've already offered it to the world for free. Even the "you" offer is not important, as the convenience of reprint has diluted the name of the producer. Network writing, especially in the form of personal blog, the nominal copyright in the actual does not exist, this is entirely dependent on the reader's self-discipline to ensure the right. Not everyone will be like me, even a quote from a quote will indicate the original source.

Still, I'm sure I'll continue blogging. Because I actually did not lose anything, in a way, other people's reprint is also the indirect recognition to me. I just write, and the rest of it is not important at the moment. Blogging itself would have been a pleasure.