Does the original really outweigh the acquisition?

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

Content is one of the Kings: Original and collection

Often heard that the more original articles the better, but really this? I 211.html "> Feel not necessarily."

I have a baby blog, about more than 20 daily diary, 80% are original content, is the mother's diary of the baby growth. Ordinarily, such content should be the search engine like. But my site for two years, the PR value is increased, but less traffic.

Baby Blog is my first website, at that time just for the interest, never thought to rely on it to make money, SEO is what things do not know. Is occasionally add a few and baby related articles. Six months later, the flow around the day ip1000 about. Then there are a few to write the diary of the mother, there are these mothers update the diary every day, I am lazy some. In these mothers introduced to each other, baby blog users also slowly increased a lot of daily log, more than 40 times, when there are more than 10. With these users, I rarely add anything. However, the flow of the site is fewer and less. Basically around 500ip. More strange is, from Baidu search over the flow of a lot less, probably just a keyword "baby blog" can come. The people who come are basically regulars. Always keep a diary of the baby.

Therefore, I think whether it is original or collection, the key is content, content to be popular, to others like to see, so just do.

I also can see in the Baby blog, hot logs are some practical articles, such as hand-made, simple strokes, etc., and the baby's growth logs and photos and so on, is the blogger himself to see or Bo Master friends and family to see, other people on your child how to grow no interest.

So "content is king" not only say content to original, more crucial is content to be useful.