Effect of the new deal on the property market: The price is still high policy is still tight

It has been known as the "severest" regulation and control measures in the history of the past hundred Days, the node of the market also appeared some new trends. "0 pay the first floor" the gimmick has not subsided, "the property market false fall" the research viewpoint again arouses the thousand layer wave. In the last one weeks, there has been a gradual pick-up in turnover, whether the data show or the sales staff feel. Prices are not too loose, but turnover began to rebound, the mentality of the buyers? In the buyer's opinion, the effect of the implementation of regulatory policies?　　Will there be more stringent policies or a more relaxed environment? 0 first pay, price reduction Fang Pan said spate recently, there is a source, located in the Longgang center of the city of Longyuan 22 sets of second-hand housing with decoration, the total construction area of 1577.44 square meters. These 22 units can be sold on a single sale, the whole batch of sales price 4800 yuan/square meters. Some of the listings are on sale with leases.　　According to the intermediary, the news release less than 3 days all units have been sold out.　　Reading the news, in Ms. Deng's opinion, the property market "has been very bad," she told reporters, son to marry, so also consider buying a house, has recently been waiting for opportunities, recently heard that some of Nanshan mansions are in the price reduction, it is estimated that a period of time should be able to sell, so recently began to look around the real estate. In fact, the Central Plains Real estate market research director Wang World, said: "0 Fang Pan of the news is estimated to be misinformation, or individual cases." Because now in general the market has rebounded, the number of people to see a significant increase in turnover moderate increase.　　Mr Fung, who works at the front line of the home sales of Vanke Property Services, told reporters that the worst of the business was over and now the market has warmed up. According to Mr Fung, the wind was already tight before the policy was introduced. "The volume of the first three months of this year has been very low, the volume of April is only more than 300 sets, under normal circumstances we have more than 2000 sets of one months." "After the introduction of the policy, turnover is" very bad ", May, June" Business is really not good ", Mr. Feng in retrospect also repeatedly shook his head.　　However, he said, now the market has "warmed up", turnover has rebounded to more than 1700 units last month. Shenzhen people for real estate enthusiasm is very high, also experienced ups and downs, with the end of the 08 regulation experience, many people will have their own judgment on the market.　　"This year and that time the situation is not the same, but feel this time the regulation has only begun," Mr. Liu, who is engaged in architectural design, told reporters. Often with buyers deal with the buyers of these psychological Mr. Feng also know a lot: "Many buyers will refer to the previous regulatory experience, to determine the market and the market."　　"Based on past experience has become a practice, but this time the policy coverage of precision and implementation of the severity of the past, and the recent spread of tax levy on the wind, for home buyers, this time seems to follow." The price is still high policy still tight housing prices is undoubtedly the most important reason to decide the purchase. After the new deal, the volume of cold once deadlocked, in many purchasesIn the heart of the house, the decline of property prices become inevitable, 30% of the decline has become a lot of home buyers psychological expectations.　　And in fact, three months after the new deal, despite some slight fall in property prices, there are some developers discount to do activities, but the price is still small changes.　　In particular, July 22, the World Union real Estate issued in the first half of China's property review, said, if the reasons for excluding the transaction structure, Shenzhen new house prices did not change, the first half of the performance of the Shenzhen property market or the national property market performance from the volume to the amount of decline in a miniature. According to the World Union real Estate Statistics, the first half of Shenzhen volume fell 27.6% year-on-year, the new house turnover fell 65%, second-hand housing is basically flat, slightly down 2.1%. The monthly and the entire first half of the year-on-year data show that the Shenzhen property market turnover has entered a downward channel. Relative transaction decline, housing prices are still very strong, the World Union data show that, from each month, the new house monthly average price is reflected in the trend of shock.　　Which January-May average price of 20000 yuan/square meters above, June average 17000 yuan/square meters, the first half of each monthly prices of the lowest, the chain fell 15.8%, compared to the February highest point fell 29.8%. The decline in the volume of luxury homes led to a fall in prices.　　Nanshan A mansion developer staff told reporters: "The current prices of luxury homes have not changed too much, but the low turnover of luxury flats will pull down the average price." A piece of data from Shenzhen Zhongyuan real Estate show that June Baoan, Longgang District Two total turnover accounted for more than 83% of the city, more than last month nearly 20%.　　The company according to the signed subscription book, signed pre-sale contract statistics also show that the June Shenzhen new house deals in the first 10 real estate in the area of Low-cost plate, the average price of more than 20000 yuan/square meters of only 3 projects, 5 project average price of 15000 yuan/square meters below.　　For this situation, the recent run to see the House of Mr. Yu deeply feel to reporters, recently Guan Guan Guan Guan saw a lot of rooms, almost not before the fall of much, so temporarily do not buy home.　　In the past, many of the most stringent policies to the end have a variety of loopholes, but this time the regulatory policy appears to be more stringent enforcement. Miss Zhu want to buy two suites, when asked a salesman, the salesperson told her: "Look at the last regulation, that is, to do so, now that the GDP of the government is a task, if the end of the year, the bank loans this piece will certainly be relaxed ah."　　But asked about the recent situation, the sales staff still said that the loan or the more strict implementation of the two suite policy. Network survey Hundred Days New Deal, facility effect how? Is the public satisfied? What are the expectations for policy regulation in the second half of the year? At present, SouFun is carrying out the property market control satisfaction survey. 75% of respondents supported or very supportive of the country's set of regulatory policies as of six o'clock on the night of July 25, but a majority of respondents said the policy had failed to achieve the goal of stabilizing property prices, with nearly half of themInvestigators believe that the second half of the real estate policy will maintain a first-form. 1. For the second set of housing "recognition and loan" criteria, 63.14% of respondents said "very much support", 9.51% expressed very no support.　　And that the policy to curb investment speculative demand "relatively large impact" accounted for 40.81% of the respondents, that "less impact" accounted for 24.53% of the "very big impact" of 16.82%, 7.17% of respondents think "no impact." 2. In response to the credit policy "more than 90 flat down payment ratio and two suites increase, suspend the issuance of a third set of mortgages and a moratorium on the purchase of home loans for non-residents who are unable to provide proof of local tax or social insurance for more than 1 years, and 60.88% per cent of respondents to this policy have" very supportive "attitudes. Very unsupported "Then there are 8.39%.　　It is considered that the policy has a "significant impact" on curbing investment speculative demand, and 20.78% of the respondents said that the impact was "very large" and that the policy had "no impact" on investment speculative demand of 8.44%.　　3. For the NDRC's "progressive housing Tax reform", 43.72% of the respondents "very much support", 14.63% of respondents "very do not support" the policy. 4. For the first half of 2010, the Government introduced further strengthen and improve the real estate market regulation, resolutely curb the rapid rise in prices in some cities, said that "very supportive" of this series of policies accounted for 56.08% of the surveyed population, "more support" of the 26.85%,6.02% said "very unsupported　　”。　　5. Expected in the next half year price trend, 35.43% think the second half of the price will be "a small drop", 26.58% of respondents think that house prices will be "a small rise", that prices will be "a big drop" of the 17.06%, the forecast "no change" of 14.73%, think that prices will "big rise" 6. Has the above policy achieved the Government's expected goal of stabilizing housing prices?　　On this issue, 53.21% of respondents said that "did not achieve", that "partial implementation" of the 29.32%, that "basic implementation" of the 9.3%, that "better to achieve" the expected goal of the 4.85%,3.32% said the goal was "well achieved." 7. Compared with the "most stringent" real estate policy, 46.01% of the respondents think that the second half of the real estate policy will "maintain the status quo", 18.85% of the population that the second half of the policy will be more stringent, 16.83% people think it will be more lenient, that the future policy will be "very strict Accounted for 13.38% of the total respondents, 4.94% of them considered to be "very lenient".