English SEO Common differences Whether you need to change the link anchor text

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

Some common English seo ideas are divided, such as whether the chain must come from the relevant theme site, not related to the ranking has not helped? for example, when doing the reverse chain, anchor text is always repeated one or two subjects of good, or should be more changes, with some long tail keywords?

Isn't the link from the related website helpful to your ranking?

Yes (I think so), but some SEO experts claim that because you get a vote from a site that doesn't have "voting weights", it's not a valid way to build trust Rank, and it's not much help to improve the relevance of your site in the search engine's eyes.

Some people think it's okay to link to what you are linked to, what works is content, such as when content is around or near anchor text. So when people join the Blogging network (blog receptacle), they see that their synchronized articles are on a completely unrelated site, and the content is in unclassified, or otherwise unrelated categories, they tend to think they don't have the relevant quality links.

Many experts agree with this, though the traditional view is that the words near the anchor text are the most decisive.

Scatter using different anchor text, Yes or NO?

In the construction process of the outside chain, should we transform using different link anchor text?

Terry Kyle says no. To a URL constantly use the same anchor text to do the reverse chain, even if you do not use the long tail keyword as anchor text, this URL will eventually get the long tail word ranking.

Angela (the famous Angela's links packets) also shares this view. According to her personal experience, even if the chain is always used as an anchor text, can also get the rank of long tail words. She thinks the long tail is partly due to the content of the page.

Okay, let's take a closer look at this.

What is the real level of competition for some keywords? From my personal point of view and experience, the more competitive words, the more you need to do in the chain to quote more long tail keyword anchor text, because you have to do the word competition is very large, you need to give this particular keyword to do a lot of anchor text links (using That exact anchor text). (so more different link anchor text is needed to play the role of dispersion)

For example, your niche is registry cleaners, you want the word "Free Registry Cleaners" to rank, so if your competitor uses the word "Free registry Cleaners" To do anchor text links, you want to The word "Free Registry Cleaners" may be a bit difficult to get ranked.

However, if your competitor does not use the "Free Registry Cleaners" as the anchor text, then you have the opportunity to use a single anchor text link to get the word "Free Registry Cleaners", provided that you have done your site optimization ( such as your URL or content include Free,registry,cleaner, etc.

Another example: analogy you open a blog, the home page set some keywords, some of which are long tail of the keywords. If your competitor doesn't have anchor text links for those long tail words, you will also get the rank of these subordinate keywords. But from my own point of view, if I just do the "link building" such anchor text, my station will not search "link building tips" Also get good rankings, because there are other stations have been for such long tail words have done different anchor text links, and has already won the rankings.

So I disagree with Terry and Angela at this point, but that doesn't mean who's right or wrong.

And then again, one thing I'd like to say is that SEO and outside-chain building needs to be concerned with ROI (return on investment). So my personal habits are like in the beginning to aim at some high conversion of keywords to do anchor text links, so we can often quickly see some results. The result here is that you've got some long tail keyword rankings before your main keyword is lined up, and you're starting to get some traffic from the long tail words on the first page, though it's a very small number of words.

Here's a little test to prove

I have some points, frankly speaking, I think some words are never in line. Until a friend told me one day that I was on the second page of the station, I looked and decided to do some linking to keep this momentum going.

At this time my some from the keyword is also no rankings, so I dispersed the anchor text began to force. A few weeks later, the principal and subordinate keywords have been on the home page.

I think the promotion of these rankings should be attributed to the traffic from the long tail, making my site more relevant to my main keyword by search engines. At the same time, I completely forgot to give another link from the keyword, the result is that the word in the first 15 pages did not see. This is not a bad thing, because it confirms my point of view.

So down, I have a very competitive word, a bit of a competitive word, there is a long tail words are on the home page, but other related words, including my domain name appeared in the keyword did not get any good rankings, until I made for these specific words to do a specific anchor text link.

So, even if I have some other related words (more competitive, more generic words) have rankings, but this is forgotten by me a bit of a competitive word is still not the ranking of the promotion, but it seems that 4 words have 3 have ranked, the fourth word is also easy to do up, Because there are other relevant words already ranked well.

Original link: SEO Gurus confusion, chapter 6,792

Source: http://semthinking.com/english-seo/740