Entrepreneur inconsistent not that scary.

Before the advent of the Internet, not only was there no channel for the civilian population to speak, but even public figures were less likely to be exposed to public opinion. So it's hard to tell which famous entrepreneur is the one with a mouthful of trains, and it's not clear what the difference is between what they said and what they are saying.

After the advent of the Internet, everyone's comments will be recorded, become the basic data of the Internet generation. So the problem arises, and people will find that many of the public figures say what's going on in front of them.

My basic view on the matter is that public figures speak with a strong sense of communication, and inconsistent will give bad demonstrations to others, especially those entrepreneurs who, unlike entertainers, tend to be examples of aspiring youth. The inconsistent of politicians is not so great, every president of the United States will be more or less renege, the more a president of the more so, for example, Clinton, who has not been the most committed to the president for decades, but he did a good job of the president.

The root of the entrepreneur's promise is that he does not leave room for himself when he speaks, and the exaggeration is exaggerated. For example, Luo once said I hammer mobile phone if sold below 2500 I am your grandson, but eventually the price of sale, provoked a lot of people to him very dissatisfied, hurt a lot of fans heart. If he had not said so, perhaps today's rebound will not be so strong, his own credibility will not be hurt so deep.

But conversely, if the hammer phone does not sell at a lower price, according to the sales speed before the price, it may take a long time to finish the inventory, perhaps at all, it will affect the next generation of hammer cell phone research and development and investment in the market. From an enterprise's point of view, Luo seems to be right, always can not to maintain a deeds image, the Enterprise to the Abyss bar. Thousand wrong million wrong, the root cause or is blown too big. The bigger the bubbles, the greater the movement after the rupture, and the causal relationship will still be there.

From the audience point of view, haha a happy on the past accounted for the majority, not to be serious in the minority, in fact, their personal injury is not as big as the imagination, the future is good, the impression will slowly change the past. I used to think that being serious was the driving force behind social progress, but the opposite of that was the traction that hindered productivity development. After a lot of philosophical thinking, I think, some people's cattle should be blown or let listen to them blown, in this matter woolly a little more space for others, it is not necessarily a bad thing.

As long as they did not blow to the disastrous, did not blow to moral decay, leading a large group of people who choose to believe in the end of the accelerated rush to death, occasionally inconsistent even lies, or not so terrible.