(Compiled/Mao) The lawsuit between Infinity Ward founder Jason West and Vince Zampella is far from over and heading in a more serious direction. The Tuesday move saw a new round of prosecutions, with the new owner of Jason West and Vince Zampella, joining the defendants. According to the allegations, in the two producers are still in the position of the work, the arts electric power in private contact with them to discuss cooperation matters, this move seriously violates the Jason West and Vince Zampella and the contract terms between the view. After being dismissed from the passive view, they immediately set up a new respawn studio to develop new games for EA. The question now is: Is it possible to prevent respawn from developing new projects for EA, according to the law, based on the new facts provided by the dynamic vision? Foreign media recently interviewed some relevant experts on the matter, the following is their views. Infinity Ward founder Jason West and Vince Zampella Legal experts say the results depend on the outcome of the next hearing. Be aware that the movement is seeking a substantial amount of compensation from the art power, even considering whether it can recover all the bonuses that were paid to west and Zampella. The move is looking for all possible measures, including a new game to prevent West and Zampella from developing "results based on the visual period". This will be the most active to promote the action of a thing, because once successful, it is tantamount to withholding the respawn's life gate. For West and Zampella, there are other Infinity Ward's former employees who accused the lawsuit of defaulting on bonuses, and that West and Zampella should be held responsible for the case. About 50 Infinity Ward employees who have left or have yet to leave have been involved in the lawsuit. Although this belongs to another separate lawsuit, whether or not it is linked to the west and Zampella lawsuit, they should pay for the matter, according to the fact that they have paid the relevant bonuses, as for West and Zampella how the distribution, dynamic vision is not clear. The lawsuit has almost become a war between the call of duty and the Medal of Honor. These two games are certainly the most recent, and any information about them attracts the attention of the player. The most new work of the Medal of Honor of the art power did not achieve the desired effect. The high level believes that the action of the prosecution may affect the reaspawn, which will affect respawn to launch new development projects for themselves. Arts and video has always been a competitor, in recent years the competition between the two more intense, become a public concern, affecting the entertainment industry, a major event. Legal experts say the lawsuit does not seem to end in a very friendly way, as onlookers may have seen a great lawsuit, but for the parties, especially the losers, whether investors or employees, will suffer great losses, the loser, is to pay. He also believes that the prosecution of the motion is not unreasonable, there are indeed many problems in the process, need Infinity Ward's founder to clarify.
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.