Fee registered domain name but no password want to pay another one times money

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

Fung commissioned three companies registered for the operation of the network domain name. After Feng found that, because there is no password, the domain name can not be used. And the other side of the answer is, want to password still have to pay 48,000 yuan. The district Court heard that three companies violate the principle of good faith, constitute a breach of contract, the first instance of the decision to support the plaintiff to terminate the contracts, refund of service charges.

Feng Department of the city's retired cadres, February 2007, with an information technology company and its Tianjin 1788.html "> Branch, Beijing, a technology company signed two" domain name/general site orders, commissioned three companies registered "China Animation City and China International Animation Network" domain name and the general Web site, Registered for 10, the service charge amounted to 48,000 yuan. However, when the above domain name and common Web site are enabled by Feng, it is found that no password is available at all. For its registered domain name company said, also must pay 48,000 yuan the use fee, only then will give von a domain name and the common website password. Fung thinks that he has paid 10 years of service charges, and then pay the use fee does not make any sense, to this end to court, to request the cancellation of the contract and refund service charges.

As the defendant, three companies believe that its relationship with Feng is only commissioned contract, will be commissioned to register the domain name, the general Web site after the registration, von a entrusted matter has been completed. "Analysis" is only an additional provision of a gift service, Feng some no website, "analysis" is not to do, if you need to "analysis", Fung should pay a further 48,000 yuan in the use of fees, access to the site can be carried out.

The Hexi Court considered that, at the conclusion of the two contracts, three companies have no evidence to prove that they have invested in the registered domain name, the general Web site related business risks and "have a Web site can be resolved" and so on the knowledge of the truth, detailed inform von A, so that three companies are using von a domain name, general knowledge of the Web site does not understand, The plaintiff is recommended to purchase the product of its design, which violates the principle of honesty, fairness and equivalence, and damages the right to know. Consider von a registered 1.5, from the principle of equal rights and obligations, Fung should pay the reasonable cost of the period, that is, 6000 yuan. Regarding the registered domain name, the common website, the three companies shall be responsible for cancellation. Thus, the court decided to lift the above order with the three companies, return von a certain 42,000 yuan.