Feng Neilin: Wage growth is higher than cpi10% is not normal

Xinhua news, by the Chinese Information and National Bureau of Statistics, co-sponsored by the Xinhua News Agency, the 2009 of the most closely watched statistics published February 22, CPI, housing prices, urban residents income and other five data were selected as the 2009 year of the most concerned statistics. We launched our second interview today, starting from 22nd, to read the "2009 Most watched statistics" series.　　National Bureau of Statistics, the director of population and employment Feng Neilin 23rd to visit Xinhua, for the vast number of users to interpret the 2009 average wage statistics.　　[Moderator] In the attention of the average wage data, also expressed the expectation of the growth rate of average wages, please give a brief introduction.　　[Feng Neilin] I see netizens on the Internet for their own attention to the choice of data, most of the net friend to the average wage is expected to have two, the first is the hope that the growth rate of wages is not less than GDP growth rate, the second is that the growth rate of wages than the CPI index is 10% higher First of all, from 1990 to now, the average wage in many places is growing faster than GDP, and since 2000 wages in many places have been beating GDP, although this average wage does not include private enterprises.　　The reason for this is that, I think, in recent years from central to Local has been very concerned about people's livelihood, the introduction of a lot of good policies.　　Second, from the CPI situation, in 1990 to 2000, the wage growth is always higher than the CPI growth, and 2000 after the CPI is about 10% higher than, it shows that the average people these years to get more benefits.　　[Moderator] Everyone wants their purchasing power not to fall. [Feng Neilin] This is always higher than the CPI 10 point phenomenon, I think it is more special, should not be a normal.　　It's impossible. We always expect wage growth to be higher than the CPI 10 points. [Moderator] That is to say, we still have to think rationally about this problem.