Comparison and evaluation of the platform of Webmaster common articles

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

Want to have a good ranking of the need for a large number of high-quality outside the chain to do the protection, and individuals feel that the best way to get the chain is to contribute to the platform, once reproduced can get a large number of outside the chain, but also to obtain traffic. The question-and-answer platform is much more reliable than the forums where the signatures are. But the submission of the audit is very strict, want to successfully publish the article is not very easy, I have chosen to contribute to the soft text for half a year, the following will give you some of my contributions to the platform and experience.

First, A5 webmaster network

Audit Speed: ★★★★★

Audit Strength: ★★★

Included Speed: ★★★★★

Reprint Wide Degree: ★★★★★

Copyright degree of respect: ★★★★★

A5 NET is able to play so high points do because in the submission is very good, that is, your evening release of the manuscript can quickly help you audit out, and once the audit through 10 minutes by the search engine will be included. So in the audit strength and included speed is a well-deserved five stars. and A5 Editor Audit personally think it is relatively easy to pass, as long as you are not plagiarism, content is not too empty, for users really valuable articles or very easy to pass the audit. And now A5 audit is also very humane, will delete the reasons for the post, rather than before the across, this is still very useful for beginners, let you know the problem, but also the direction of the efforts. Of course A5 audit some friends also feel still too difficult, feel unreachable. I think it is not necessary to do so, I have contributed to the A5 has been included in more than 10, and I was a rookie, from the composition has never been too high points. I just write my own experiences and opinions, and I don't need your good literary talent. As long as you are content with logic, do not copy false original, the user has a value audit is very easy. Reprinted widely is also five stars, this I did the actual contrast, we put the passage of the article title "Title+ article title" Into the search engine search, the result is basically you publish this article place. Of course, this is not necessarily all with your links, and this result A5 is indeed the most, and many are with their own copyright. After all, A5 popularity is still very high, many sites are directly to collect his content, so the link is still a lot of reservations. So the copyright respect A5 score is also very high. As for how easy to pass A5 audit here I will not say, we can look for information. Anyway A5 composite index: ★★★★★.

Second, webmaster home Chinaz

Audit Speed: ★★★★

Audit Strength: ★★★★★

Included Speed: ★★★★☆

Reprint Wide Degree: ★★★★★

Copyright degree of respect: ★★★★★

Chinaz is a veteran webmaster network, but the personal feeling of the audit is very strict, I have contributed more than 30 articles incredibly only one audit passed, seriously hit the enthusiasm of my contribution ah, so it is recommended that novice or do not manage webmaster home to contribute. Chinaz in the audit speed than A5 slower, not working time is not audited, but the working time period is very good audit speed. Included speed and copyright respect and A5 comparison is similar. The intensity of the reprint is slightly worse than the A5. Composite index: ★★★★☆. Compared to the A5 webmaster home or worse.

Third, seowhy

Audit Speed: ★★★★

Audit Strength: ★★★

Included Speed: ★★★★

Reprint WIDE Degree: ★

Copyright Degree of RESPECT: ★

Search outside the opening of the submission time is not very long, audit speed is not good. And the opening column is also more trouble, to cast a number of drafts, audit efforts in general. But the reprint degree is not very high, or say very little. Generally are manually reproduced, the artificial reprint is basically not too much attention to copyright, so the search on the publication of a wide range of reproduction and copyright respect on the score is not high. But the search is very good, that is, you can write other content, it is not necessarily necessary to promote the site operation of these content, personal feelings and other can be written. The relevance of such articles to their links is good. Seowhy weight is good, so the composite index: ★★★.

Four, push.

Audit Speed: ★★★★

Audit Strength: ★

Included Speed: ★★★★

Reprint WIDE Degree: ★

Copyright Respect Degree: ★

To tell the truth to push A in my heart ranked very low, before casting some hard original content up, the results were reproduced all did not take the copyright. I can only say loudly that this A5 on the quality than you this push a lot higher. But also from all aspects of analysis, audit speed is really very fast, usually basically and A5,chinaz almost. Audit strength is not high, generally readable articles, not plagiarism or very easy to pass the audit. Included in the speed is also good, but compared to the top two or less. So push a composite index: ★★☆.

Web site of the fifth to second star

28 Push, the stragglers, the master of these only stay I will not one by one score, basically can only be reduced to two names and the like. Chivalrous Webmaster Station seems to now contribute to the problem, but also can barely to Samsung half, now I go to submit all the error, and the laggards and 28 push These forum forms of the site to send an original article not add essence is not used. Refinement and more difficult, and a lot of reprint is not with copyright. No respect for the fruits of labor. However, their weight is still some, with their own links to cast some manuscript or can bring good outside the chain.

Web site of the sixth to first star

W3SO Webmaster Network, small A5, webmaster College, push the network, the sky Exchange chain these sites are my usual collection of websites. These web site composite index is indeed very good, the weight of the general, almost nothing reproduced, did not reprint more do not mention copyright. However, their audit efforts are relatively low, it is recommended that the main sites in the submission of these mainstream websites can also cast some drafts of the site. At least get some chain and some reprint opportunities. After all, these sites do this contribution will certainly want to do the better, people are not famous now you do not vote, and so has the reputation of the audit efforts will be big.

Soft article is indeed a good external chain method, in A5 or Chianz website successfully through an article can get about 200 of the outside chain, of course, there are some difficulties in the submission. So we should learn more about the "performance" of these submissions and make optimization easier. This article by 12366 Tax net http://www.abc12366.com creation reprint Please famous source, thank.