DJ class website How much is slim, how many successful?

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest stationmaster buy cloud host technology Hall

Webmaster, is to lead their own users to create value on the Internet, can not peremptorily forward blindly, celebrities a point where to play. The webmaster is the entrepreneur, the entrepreneur needs to think independently.

China's DJ website, according to statistics, is more than Chinese music websites. Baifei once Baidu, search "DJ" to find relevant pages about 55,300,000. Search for "music" to find relevant pages about 100,000,000 articles. (Because this is the Chinese website, not to mention Google,baifei is not a comment on Google)

Here Baifei need to explain, "music" this keyword is only so much more than "DJ", because "music" keyword than "DJ" hot. The engine naturally searches for a relatively few. But this does not explain that the music station is more than the DJ station.

You can look at the purity inside. Most of the keywords "DJ" search out are DJ websites. And the "music" of the keyword search out most of the music related to music relative to the proportion of music stations, music stations smaller points.

Here Baifei to question the length of the music website. There is no DJ dance section of the music station, the same DJ dance station has music section.

(This music station is believed to have DJ dance section, and DJ dance station few pop music columns)

This question everybody later slowly understand, here does not do too many discussions.

Here I am:

Baifei think, a good site must have enough good content, and the content of the creative ability, editing is always inferior to users,

After all, the number of users is much more than the editor (effective creativity is not discussed).

(This example DJKK, the day IP about 200,000.) To the forum for examples.

Create content by users, edit selected guide, use content to attract new users, retain new users with the essence, transform new users with the exchange of content

Creator, is the best web model, is also the ideal state of the Web2.0, the model itself does not have any errors.

But the question is whether Web2.0 is a constant success, or how many sites can afford to play Web2.0.

The most important thing about the new website is to attract the user's content and stimulate the visitor into the user's content.

Don't expect users to be able to help you create these things, all people are willing to be spectators rather than creators-unless he loves, recognized your site, and to allow viewers to recognize your site is the need for your site has enough, enough good content, to meet the needs of the audience, on this basis, It is possible to turn spectators into creators through guidance.

In the absence of effective content, without effective guidance, only a model, it is difficult to make viewers become creators.

At the same time, after I and some relatively large webmaster contact, but also found an interesting phenomenon: when a site has a CMS and other channels such as the Forum, the CMS is the largest flow, and the forum traffic is not directly proportional to the CMS, the number of posts is surprisingly small.

This kind of website is like anime such content provides the website, the webmaster is very smart to understand their own site classification and development path, the use of CMS, more convenient and more effective to show the content of the site's resources, do a good job seo, easy to win a lot of traffic, they then consider how to convert traffic into users, into communication, Create content. (Djkk is currently a member of the Daily dance, member upload function)

And from the site to accumulate a lot of traffic in the process, they only need a webmaster and very few editors. Compared to a direct start from 0, cost a lot of people, a lot of energy to guide visitors to upload, find songs, and even their own to others to collect dance music, to the end there is no flow, there is no user communication. This kind of rational station way of effect can be seen.

Baifei think, do stand should first calm down to clear what they need most, understand the advantages of their site, how to develop. Instead of spending time searching for programs.

At present, the program in the DJ station is almost the same. Technical webmaster Change, no technology on the original program in use.

Program is dead, people are alive, in the same procedure, the site content is more important.

Demand-driven capabilities, not "feature-driven requirements."

When you want to do a local information publishing site, using Supesite is significantly more effective than using Disucz.

When you want to do a picture sharing site, using the forum mode is certainly not as good as using a CMS.

Discuz is the best forum program, but not all of the website's Snake balm.

In addition, as a third party and discuz enthusiasts so long, I also found that: many webmasters are only concerned about what the new version of what has been enhanced, only focus on what new style, new plug-ins, and do not pay attention to these new features, new Plug-ins, how the new style in their own site to be effectively used.

Powerful is a good thing, but this should not be the webmaster concerns, the webmaster should be concerned about their site is what they need now, is the promotion, is the guide, the lack of good editing to create and organize content, or really lack of what functions?

Forget who's chatting with the same question.

Some webmasters are only concerned about these problems because they are confused, and in confusion and lazy to explore, lax management.

And functional innovation is the developer of the things, is a third party things, they do not need to expend effort.

So the energy is no longer spent thinking about the operation of the site, but in the new function of the. After all, people always want others to do more for themselves.

However, to do the station is always your own business. No one can help.

Without figuring out your needs and patterns and driving your own needs with functionality, the Web site development is dangerous.

The only result of biting and greed is that nothing can be done.

Just as with "production relations must adapt to the level of productivity", for a website, a pattern, some functions must meet the current development needs of the site.

Web2.0 is almost the best web model, but it's not the right one to start with.

It would be impossible to make the current American capitalism a business-undeveloped China.

It is difficult to apply the Web2.0 model directly because it is not adaptable, unless your site is Web2.0 at the outset and has an absolutely good pattern to attract and retain users.

Although the model is good, but can not be applied is the most critical problem.

Rational thinking becomes very important in the case of the Internet, where there are not too many rules.

In particular, the webmaster, is to lead their own users to create value on the Internet, can not peremptorily forward blindly, celebrities a point where to play.

The webmaster is the entrepreneur, the entrepreneur needs to think independently.