Look at the engine's crawl and ranking of original articles from small incision

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

Yesterday (12.18) wrote an article:< purchase website should pay attention to nine questions >

The article first published in the laggards, and then released to the Eric Network, and released in the Webmaster network, finally find a friend in the digging news network.

At five o'clock in the afternoon, all three engines were included. But the rankings are different.

Take a look at this very small incision today. The main engine for the original article crawl into the rankings.

The following search screenshot time is 12.19 a.m. 11 points.

All is the "purchase site should pay attention to the nine questions" with a colon search results.

First look at Baidu.

Estimate the rankings. Most professionals look at the one after the character laughs.

Can see out, Baidu for the article ranking is in chronological order. The beginning of the article I mentioned the order of publication.

As for why the top of the unknown blog in the first. I think the only explanation is that Baidu Spider is the latest one

Grab the article. You can see the problem from the snapshot. There's evidence.

My second paragraph in that article gave an example of the original:

"I have successfully purchased a very good domain name through this site: www.99wol.com View other History in 2005 was once a mechanical class site. ”

When posted on the webmaster Net, the editor may feel I am ad. So put the above domain name. (point) deliberately changed. Period)

And this is the end of the snapshot.

Be sure to say. This article is copied after 12.18th 10 o'clock in the morning. or collect the past. (Because of the 10, 11544.html "> I contacted the editor to change the sentence)

So, in other words, the first address. is the Last post.

And from this small incision, we can see that Baidu in the rankings for the time is very important. The final release often gets good rankings.

Baidu for the article crawl speed is relatively fast, but for whether original, where to start. It seems that there is no deal.

In fact, there are a lot of examples. If you have a friend who has sent original articles, you are now searching for the name of your article in Baidu.

Estimates are generally not ranked first, unless the reprint rate is extremely low.

Take a look at Google

Two days ago read an article in Xiaopeng: Google in the process of content originality

One of the words is: This approach means that, who first issued, immediately to the rank, the following included regardless of whether you are the weight of the site, are under the original.

It seems that GG to do this, still need a little time ...

If you look at it from this screenshot, it looks like GG and Baidu are similar. The one that was released the late. or the one that was last crawled. Ranked first

Digging up the news is 19 hours ago, and the webmaster network is 23 hours ago ...

Webmaster Net article.

If you press "who issued first, immediately to rank" that should be the first in the outdated ... and backwardness is behind.

The processing and sequencing of original articles is indeed an urgent problem for the engine to solve.

But the rankings did not appear, such as Baidu pictures of those unknown blog rankings. All have a certain popularity of the site.

It. GG ranked more value is the weight of the site.

Finally look at Yahoo

To be honest, I really rarely pay attention to the Yahoo engine.

Only heard that there are specifically for Google, there are dedicated to Baidu. Rarely heard of a special study of Yahoo ...

From this screenshot can be seen. Yahoo also pays more attention to crawl time and the weight of the site.

And as for the rankings did not crawl to the webmaster Net article. I was a little surprised.

From the small incision of this article, you can see the three major engine for the original article ranking factors, the article's crawl time plays a very important role.

Make a few screenshots to see.

The three engines for the article ranking, are crawling the most late row in front. Second, look at the weight of the site.

Of course it was just a little experiment. And the experiment was viewed after the day of the article. Relatively speaking, the observation time is comparatively short.

Or in a few days, it will be sorted again. Maybe ... What will happen in the next few days.