Ocean Wang Shinqing Notice clear and unclear sales contract is doubtful
Source: Internet
Author: User
KeywordsOcean Jinzhou
"Red Weekly" 84 article "Ocean Wang Xin, subsidiary suspected of illegal was checked" reported the Marine Wang Zhaoming Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Ocean King", sz.002724) wholly-owned subsidiary Shenzhen Ocean King Lighting Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "lighting engineering Company"), At the beginning of this year Jinzhou Cultural Sports Center and the Olympic Sports Center Stadium renovation Project Sports Lighting bidding activities, due to the existence of private seal, Wai superscript, collusion related personnel set up the threshold of tendering and other illegal violations, was Jinzhou and Jinzhou inspection and Industry Bureau investigation. In this report, the Sea King issued a special clarification bulletin, but the reporter found that the notice is clear and unclear. Cynical, clarifying the announcement of the clear and unclear ocean King in November 11 clarification Notice said: "1, as of now, the company has not received Jinzhou inspection and industrial and commercial departments of Jingzhou City for investigation Jinzhou Cultural and Sports Center and Olympic Sports Center Stadium renovation Project Sports Lighting Bidding activities letter or notice, Nor has he received the Jinzhou Discipline Inspection Commission and Jingzhou City Industrial and commercial departments to investigate the lighting engineering company involved in the relevant tendering activities; 2, in January 2014, the Jinzhou Culture and Sports center of the bidding activities, lighting engineering company won the bid, in July completed the installation of lighting equipment and acceptance of qualified, August put into use In March 2014, Jinzhou Olympic Sports Center Stadium renovation project bidding activities, lighting engineering company failed to win the bid. In this announcement, although the Sea King admitted in January 2014 Jinzhou Culture and Sports center of the bidding activities, lighting engineering company won the bid, however, did not have its subsidiary lighting engineering company has private Seal, Wai Biao, collusion related personnel set the threshold of tendering and other illegal violations of the relevant instructions, Only indicated that has not received the Jinzhou discipline Inspection and the Jingzhou City Industry and Commerce Department investigation. The answer, which ignores the focus of the incident, does not clarify whether the subsidiary has breached the law. In order to track the investigation of this case, "Red weekly" reporters on the November 12 to the telephone line of the case in charge of Jingzhou city trade and Industry Bureau Liu Changming Detachment, Liu Captain said in the telephone, Jinzhou discipline Commission to this case attaches great importance, the reporter last interview, the city of the relevant leadership of the disciplinary commission to convene a case meeting, Now the case is further investigation, and so the investigation of the case will report to the Discipline Inspection Commission, the investigation results published by Jinzhou Discipline Inspection Bureau shall prevail. Reporters in the telephone on the ocean Wang Shinqing notice in the announcement of "did not receive Jinzhou Inspection Commission and the Department of Industry and Commerce to investigate lighting engineering companies involved in the relevant tendering activities" for consultation, Captain Liu told reporters to trust the government departments, and reconfirmed the case by their own detachment to investigate. For the Jingzhou project, the reporter thinks that the Sea King in answer this important need to verify the question is a little rash, after all the accident of the ocean Wang Lighting engineering Company in the listed parent company position is very key, and its table profit contribution accounted for about 50% of listed companies, and the listed company's 90% sales is also its, for a subsidiary of such a serious incident, as a responsible listed company should be carefully investigated and the results of the release, rather than simply "did not receive Jinzhou discipline inspection and Industry Department of Jingzhou to investigate the company to participate in the relevant tendering activities of the situation" to deal with the matter. Similarly, in the Jinzhou Olympic Sports Center Stadium renovation Project, company to a "failed to win the bid" around, think of the informer reflects the "Jinzhou Olympic Sports Center Stadium renovation Project bidding activities, the Prince of the company suspected of collusion related personnel to set up a tender threshold, crowding out competitors" behavior, has been confirmed that Jingzhou city discipline inspection and industrial and commercial departments involved in the investigation, the nature has not yet been qualitative, how can it be "not the successful bidder" in the vicinity? In the course of the investigation, the reporter also found that the Sea King there are some other puzzling problems. There are some doubts in the sales contract according to the Ocean King's prospectus, as of June 30, 2014, it is still within the validity period, the transaction amount of more than 5 million yuan contract, or the transaction amount is not more than 5 million yuan, but for the company's production and operation activities, future development or financial situation has a significant impact on the The second construction company of the third building companies to install the company East China Manager "amount of 2.1774 million yuan lighting equipment sales contract." Reporter inquires The national Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (Hubei) found that the full name of the company should be "China building three second construction Engineering limited liability company installation Branch." and Hubei Jingzhou City Sports Center sports Lighting Project Bidding party is the sales contract signed the company's head office of the second Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Therefore, we have reason to believe that the sales contract should be the Ocean King Jinzhou Sports Center Sport Lighting Project after the successful sales contract, but the strange thing is, Ocean King's sales contract is not signed with the tendering company, but with its installation branch? In addition, the Sea King is awarded at 5591156 Yuan bid price, but the sales contract with the bid price difference of more than 2.4 million, if the purchase bid price contains the lighting construction costs, then in the Sea King of the construction contract should include the contract, but the reporter consulted the prospectus of the lighting project construction contract, No such contract was found. Where are the remaining more than 2.4 million dollars? As the sales contract is signed with the installation branch of the tender party, construction party exists is the possibility of the installation branch of the tender party, and if things like reporter analysis of such, the Sea King to more than 5.5 million won the bid, and then more than 2.4 million of the installation works to the tender company branch to do, with such a relationship between the interests of The Sea King appears like the Informer report with the related personnel collusion, the private engraved seal carries on the marking behavior is not difficult to understand, but all these are the reporter's hypothesis inference, the truth still needs the Jingzhou city discipline Inspection and the industry and Commerce Department to investigate the verification. The structure of fixed assets, the composition of employees and their operating income there is an unreasonable place according to the prospectus, Ocean King is specialized in special environmental lighting equipment research and development, production, sales and service company, producedProducts covered by fixed lighting equipment, mobile lighting and portable lighting equipment three series, and its main business income from the three major categories of products. For such a research and development, production, sales-oriented enterprises, production equipment and production personnel needs should not be too low, after all, in the reporting period, its main business income each year in more than billions of yuan. However, surprisingly, as of June 30, 2014, the Sea King fixed assets of the machine equipment net worth only 2.3592 million yuan, and the original value is only 11.0563 million yuan, while the key production equipment net worth of only 743200 yuan, the original value is less than 4 million. With such a small amount of machinery and equipment, how can we create billions of yuan in operating income? This is really difficult to understand, to know the same industry Foshan lighting at the end of 2013, the amount of machinery and equipment net worth of up to 232 million yuan, the original value of up to 908 million yuan, its operating income is only 2.527 billion yuan (data from the 2013 annual report of Foshan lighting). As a production enterprise, the number of its machine equipment and production personnel is to be guaranteed, not enough machinery and equipment and production personnel, product supply and quality can not be guaranteed. Ocean King Billions of yuan operating income, only need millions of yuan of machine equipment, this has surprised the people, and the number of Sea King production staff is less pitiful, as of June 30, 2014, the total number of Sea King production staff of only 393 people, the total number of employees accounted for 13.31%. Foshan lighting in the same industry at the end of 2013, the number of production staff is as high as 7991 people, accounting for the total number of employees 90.04%. Even if the ocean Wang Yi Direct Selling mode, the proportion of marketing personnel is highly understandable, but how can such a small number of production personnel guarantee the supply and quality of products and achieve huge operating income? This is highly questionable. November 12, the reporter called the Sea King wanted to verify the above issues and leave their contact, but as of press, the reporter did not receive the Sea King any reply.
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.