Foreign media commentary Galaxy Gear: bulky and not fashionable

Samsung released its long-awaited smart watch--galaxy Gear in Wednesday. The possible pricing of the Galaxy gear (the global price is 299 dollars, but the U.S. domestic pricing has not yet been announced) and equipment compatibility is largely its characteristics. These are both interesting and logical, but the most immediate concern is what the Galaxy Gear has. Samsung described Galaxygear as an "Idol trend accessory" at its press conference. And because of their due respect for the Samsung design team, I'm not sure what they think of as "Idol Pie". From the exposed screws to the strange steel surfaces around the screen and to the inconspicuous pattern on the strap, this is not a watch with a stylish look. As Johngruber thinks, if your smart watch doesn't look much better than the ipod embedded watch, why pay attention to it? It's googleglass with the spit and the old-fashioned exterior is really dora. But I prefer to take googleglass in public and not bring a galaxygear. Of course, this is largely because I am a technology, not a fashion person. However, obviously, as a woman, I am not in the target market of Samsung. Except for men, but for men. Although Samsung ostensibly says its target market includes women and men, the size, shape and overall design of the watch seem to be a fundamental consideration for women's wrist characteristics. As Mashable's editor-in-chief, Lanceulanoff, said in Wednesday: "At the very least, they also have a variety of colours." "But this feature is not exclusive to Samsung. Most other smart watches on the market are a little bit more attractive to fashionable women. Pebble, for example, is not much smaller than galaxygear. As far as I'm concerned, the difference is that most smart watches are now viewed as sports watches on the market. Pebble is an example. First of all, it is waterproof, and second, compared with galaxygear, it can use the occasion is a lot of rich. Pebble on my wrist (I have suggested that the Pebble team begin to develop a smaller watch that is favored by women), but I can accept it because it is not a product of fashion. Galaxygear, on the other hand, is largely not a bodybuilding or sporting accessory--the impression the S brand gives. Although it also has a lot of features to facilitate people's fitness, but I do not call it a sports watch. If a device looks big and bulky, no matter how powerful it is, it will not be what I want to wear. Samsung's official video easily avoids the panorama of women wearing the watch. The angle of the video is just like this and straight forward, making galaxygear bigThe small and the shape does not seem to have a problem in fact. Although the Swedish music industry's pair of rock Idols praised Galaxygear (which is not surprising because they are star partners), I was frightened when I actually saw the watch on a woman's wrist. Seriously, where is it fashionable? What's worse--if you're unlucky enough to have a slim wrist, the watch band itself can be a major problem. If I use Pebble, even my lunatikipodnano, I can at least use a strap that is shorter or more suitable for my wrist. However, if it is galaxygear, its strap is not replaceable by the user because its camera is embedded on the strap. Moreover, Samsung has not designed the strap to be adjustable (or replaceable), making it almost impossible for galaxygear to become a real accessory for women (or men). Samsung is doing well in the Galaxy series in terms of attracting women's markets. Although the company may not distribute women and men equally, as Apple does, I can see that galaxys3/s4 and galaxynote are almost equal to men and women. I have not found any female friend who is using the Galaxy series to accept wearing galaxygear, let alone purchased. Is too big, too inconspicuous and too masculine. Ironically, its camera and memographer photography (which allows users to add text to images and share them with social networks) are more attractive to young women than younger men. As a tech-controlled woman, I'm a big fan of smart watches. By producing products that are clearly not designed for our slim wrist and style, Samsung seems to have decided to give up half its market. This can't be right. Is it possible?