From thousand people, to million people, has been to do millions of people buy?

Recently, more than three questions asked by friends, strung up quite a bit of flavor:
1. What do you think of the overwhelming Groupon wind?
2. Group purchase from the "thousand people" level to "million people" level, and then to "million people"?
3. "Amoy Rivers and Lakes" + "Taobao" = "All the World Amoy"?

· Business E-commerce, its essence is to use the Internet and other modern means to complete http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/31946.html "> Commodity trading, it from the birth, Faced with the traditional retail channels and even brand manufacturers that is the situation of cooperation and struggle against the volume of different opponents, how to break the bureau is the first task, Price is the most straightforward way, but not the only choice.

Marketing, is to put "this stone value 1000 yuan" this story spread into notoriously and the process, promotion, is to "value 1000 yuan stone" dozen a 88 percent, attract eyeballs and speed up sales

· Buy/second Kill, is a way of promotion, its purpose, or to complete the task of rapid promotion of new products, or to cover other related merchandise sales, or rapid clearance. So the traditional retail channel and even the brand Chamber of Commerce use it, but at the same time it will prevent it. Otherwise, this trick will be naked to "the so-called value of 1000 yuan stone" pull back to the brand is unacceptable price system, which is contradictory to its marketing system. But for many emerging e-commerce sites, it is almost the only sign.

From thousand people to million people, from the act of a double to shout slogans, this "regiment" is not that "regiment".

• Internet economy, always in "Generate Flow", "Aggregation Flow", "consumption flow" three of the fuss, "Amoy Rivers and Lakes" + "Taobao" purpose is to make the three flat, aggregate consumers and the relevant information required to promote their purchase decision cycle as much as possible, this matter is not wrong, only the cost and not cost-effective choice