High-profile Chen is part of the freedom of charity

-Shinkyo Chengdu Business newspaper commentator perhaps Bill Gates and Warren Buffett did not think that they would come to China to have a charity dinner, it will set off a dispute about the moral issues of charity.　　The first public commitment to the naked donor response to Chen, provoked a lot of questioning, some people think he stood in the moral commanding heights, there are "forced to donate" suspicion, and even some people suspect that his "China's first good" is "China's first cheat." In the final analysis, charity is a free enterprise. A person, whether he is a billionaire, or a rise to the people, do not do charity, donate no money, all should be based on their own conscience-driven and free choice, not forced by external forces. This is the meaning of charitable "third distribution", which is different from the "second distribution" of public finance guaranteeing equal public service and basic human rights.　　Perhaps in this sense, the doubters argue that High-profile Chen has undermined the freedom of charity. Yet High-profile Chen is just part of the freedom of charity. For he has the freedom to choose a high profile of good deeds and to preach charitable morals. When he said, "the income of the rich has the contribution of the State, society and others", but it is a fact that the fact that a rich or an entrepreneur earns the maximum profit on the basis of compliance with the law is "contribution to the country, society and others", and is both sides of a coin. As for "to die in the super-rich is a disgrace", but its personal charitable ideas and moral slogans. Of course, he tried to learn more about the rich through such moral preaching and practice, but this could not be said to be "moral kidnapping".　　Because Chen's cursor is only his own, he did not grasp the public power, also did not grasp public opinion public, so did not deprive others of charity freedom. Some people disdain Chen's high-profile good deeds, that he is "angling for fame" and squeeze "charity dividend". However, he never shied away from his pursuit of fame, and he liked to be remembered for good deeds, and thought that it would be more of a boon to the formation of a charitable culture. At the same time, he is not denying that the more he donates, the more he earns, the bigger his career. But what does that mean? It can only be said that charity in China is indeed a very scarce moral resource, so that Chen could create a charitable image to obtain a huge "dividend." It is also a free choice that market first-mover always takes the initiative.　　As more and more charitable people enter the market and engage in free competition, the "charitable dividend" is diluted. Perhaps the High-profile Chen has a utopian philanthropic dream, but it is also part of the freedom of charity.　　Today's society, which can tolerate the charitable freedom of some billionaires bucket even skinflint, can tolerate the freedom of high profile and good deeds.　　"Netizen's voice" Jiangsu Netizen Red Dragon: Good value, but to stand the test of time is a true hero. Shanghai Netizen World: Do not need to be demanding, Chen is wild way of charity, like Buffett is the regular army, this point should be international standards.