Houweigui: "Technology + finance"

"Style" again the story of the ups and downs to Houweigui mouth, have become a handful of water-the thin 66-year-old, still remain an astonishing old-school engineer's true nature: the eyes mild, language level, introverted even some shy.　　Perennial a regular jacket, zipper pull very much, only a little shirt collar. However, he is a sharpness, hidden in his answer to the question does not whitewash, do not dodge, do not weigh in. The 67-Year-old, who maintained a year in more than 50 countries and regions, talked about the most is "strategy"-ZTE's own competitiveness strategy, future market strategy, and even China's communications industry's independent innovation strategy.　　The industry leader's response and vision explain why ZTE achieved its first 25 years of success, and painted the vision for the next 25 years.　　The sharpness of the answer implies the foresight of a leader. Teachers, technicians, engineers, managers, until the helm of a multinational company--Houweigui's 30-year transition and crossing, while clinging to the indifferent nature of the same time, but free from the majority of old-school intellectuals and most of the early achievements of the state-owned enterprises are ultimately difficult to escape the fate: Love the laboratory, he recruited a　　Academics and teachers to start a business together, but his enterprise successfully overcame the technology of the paranoid and blind obedience, indifference to fame, not publicity, but he knows that property relations are the key to activating the development of enterprises, led a group of engineers took the lead on the "to nationalization" of the road, and became the first batch of reform and opening-up technology beneficiaries of wealth.　　At the same time, he has been to more than 70 countries, and the success of the products sold in more than 130 countries and regions, he promoted a Chinese technology company's globalization, where the product also witnessed the 30-year changes in China's diplomatic relations.　　In response to "ZTE in the next few years to enter the top three global communications equipment," he simply replied, "This is 35 years," the tone is as simple as the old teacher to comment on the students a calculated exam. The remainder is king-a particularly profound one in the global telecoms market after the 2008-2009 global financial turmoil. North American telecom giant Nortel Network collapsed, after the merger of the old European manufacturers Nokia-Siemens, Alcatel-Lucent shadow lingering, market share was lost.　　At the same time, China's two companies ZTE, Huawei Technology has sprung up, in the global, or even 3G stronghold-Europe, and constantly replace the network of European and American manufacturers. 20 years ago, his vision to the rapid growth of ZTE, to verify the Chinese High-tech industry in the global competition in the process, every step forward to pay the difficult and game.　　Whether China can continue to produce more ZTE and Huawei in high-end manufacturing and high-end services will haunt us for the next 30 years. "Original" China 3G Licensing selected the best time to rely on local equipment manufacturers and operators of the cooperation of the "3G license issued to take into account the balanced development, I hope China Mobile will be in TD alsoIs that China's independent research and development of international standards can be a little more support. In fact, for mobile, they also did not suffer, because the frequency to TD than the other two more than one times, frequency resources are very valuable, and the country has other support, of course, its maturity, industrial chain is also poor.　　There are long and short. At present, there are many statements about the advantages and disadvantages of the three standards, and objectively evaluate the current network level is similar.　　Since the transfer from 3G to 2G, from 3G to 2G traffic is almost the same, the first half of the gap, but the second half of the switch has been very good. The rest is the terminal, the terminal industry chain TD and the other two-mode gap is larger. China Mobile has been swinging before, who dares to do it? Because after doing a lot of investment, if you do not need to I am not miserable (laugh)? The state does not subsidize it. So TD is the chip late. Chip this thing will take 2-3 years to commercialize, so TD terminal than UMTS to have a gap, I estimate the gap in 1-2 years, this is the rate gap. The other is maturity, price, etc. there are gaps. Now China Mobile is speeding up cooperation with the terminal plant and Chip factory, to catch up with the matter, the follow-up development is not a big problem. "To expand the global market, Chinese enterprises and financial institutions to establish a" technology + finance "advantage portfolio" after the financial crisis, a lot of foreign operators to our needs, one is the recognition of our technology; second, they think China's capital is safer overall, and China's financial system is relatively healthy globally.　　So they want to get financing from China, which they didn't want in the past. The international financial sector is protected by a number of thresholds, and in order to protect its own finances, its companies have opted to operate in their own banks. But in the financial crisis, foreign operators are also worried about the future of their financial institutions, so there is more demand for China's funds, willing to accept China's loans.　　This provides us with the opportunity to combine the advantages of ' technology + finance ' to get more market opportunities. For example, the National Development Bank is doing a better job and its working group has covered more than 100 countries and regions. These teams are not retail-oriented and will be able to work with us on a number of major projects, and team members have a better understanding of the situation abroad and can control risk. If the financial institutions in Beijing, only by us to introduce them, and then a trip to the poor, this is not, not in-depth understanding of the project risk understanding will be biased. ”