How to change the world by donating money

Bringing wealth into the grave has become the epitaph of a despicable person. The heart is virtuous. So, we are happy to see disillusioning, Chen, Huang, and so on "China edition Carnegie" Wave by Wave. Even in the winter of shrinking global wealth, we can still hear ——— "The Bill Gates Foundation's assets have shrunk by one-fifth, but this has not stopped the foundation's philanthropy."　　The good news is certainly more warm. There's also bad news. We'll hear people complaining, I don't know where I donated my money. Or are you skeptical that the person who donated is doing well?　　Even people are angry, we donated so much money, but found the world is still a mess!　　In short, in short, why is your kindness not well reported?　　World famine and encyclopedia back words, donate rice, please on the FreeRice (www.FreeRice.com) NET, with your intelligence and mouse for the hungry people to collect rice, each page will appear a synonym choice problem, each answer a question, for the poor area donated 10 grains of rice. The United Nations Food Development Agency launched the Public Service Web site, opened from October 7, 2007, as of today (May 10), the total number of rice collected is: 63970967730, that is 63.9 billion tablets. How heavy are the rice? According to the Good people calculate: A rice is about 0.026 grams, that is to say, every 40,000 grains of rice weighs about 1 kilograms, so 63.9 billion grains of rice weigh about 1660 tons.　　If the meal is 32 meters per person, that 1660 tons of rice can be 11.07 million people to eat a meal. If "solve 11.07 million people a meal" is not enough to describe the "mouse for rice," the huge energy, let us according to its game rules reverse reckoning, how 63.9 billion grains of rice to produce? If according to each participant correctly 10 questions (these topics are not easy, I do the second way on the card shell) to calculate, each correct 1 to donate 10 grains of rice: 63.9 billion =10x10x6.39 billion.　　That is to say, at least 639 million people (about 1/10 of the world's population) are involved in this public event! This is the fascinating appeal of group collaboration. This name from the western best-selling book, in philosophy and the Chinese saying "bit by bit, rice into the basket" quite a source.　　In the eyes of the new public service practitioners, the power of the group not only can be compiled into the world's greatest encyclopedia ——— Wikipedia, it can also change the organization of public activities, so that public welfare activities more simple and easy to participate in the characteristics of everyone. "Now the civic organization is the expert's worldview. That is, some people enjoy more knowledge, judgment and participation than others. For example, the student website, the Ombudsman is often by default more judgment of the privileges, eligibility to review the power. ...... I appreciate the online wiki encyclopedia model. In this model, there is a premise that most actions are well-meaning and most people's judgments are accurate. "One kilogram more," founder Bynum wrote in his own space. ButMore realistically, "the management of this process cannot be done by a limited organization because of the sheer number of people." Therefore, if we do not consider the use of China's huge national administrative system, the remaining option is to the operation of the process is also given to the public. Through participation, the public can gradually learn to collaborate, organize and innovate and become a more professional ' player '. In the future, perhaps more new organizations will be emerging from these participants. "Don't doubt that a small group of people who are full of thought and responsibility can change the world." In fact, this is the only event that has happened before.　　Margaret Mead Margaretmead, the American human scholar, said so. Want to save the world? Save yourself first. Even if the great Wikipedia affects billions of "know molecules", it still has the same ——— as most 2.0 sites and cannot convert human traffic into cash flow.　　According to the public information, the Fund that maintains its operation mainly comes from a foundation that has its fans as its main donor.　　And many of the "Save the World" as the responsibility of the charitable organizations are also facing difficulties to protect themselves, must first save their embarrassing situation. According to Fang Jun, a media observer, the public welfare system is divided into four parts, which are the suppliers, collectors, distribution platforms and executing parties of financial resources. Suppliers, including ordinary individuals, enterprises, government agencies and so on who are willing to donate capital time; the collecting party mainly takes the foundation as the main body, such as the public Offering foundation which is represented by the one fund and the Non-public offering foundation (such as the South Capital Foundation) which is the main body of the fund-raising, and the platform of the distribution platform, that is, the evaluation and distribution of various public welfare projects, As the following will refer to the NPI (see C12), the executive side is the direct implementation of the public service, to help the final beneficiaries of the organization, but also the focus of the topic of the civil service organizations and "social enterprises" (For more information, please refer to c10-11). But in our country's legal category, in this public welfare system, raises the fund one link is highly controlled, the executive party and the distribution platform mainly relies on the foundation "blood transfusion".　　However, in recent years, charitable organizations such as weeds grow, fierce competition, the foundation as the largest "blood bank" is also difficult to meet, to the public welfare organizations put forward a higher "hematopoietic" requirements. Even a famous economist like Mao, his public-works program is not "full of pockets". "Southern Weekend" 2007 reported that during the 2003 "SARS", in order to maintain the operation of Fuping Home Economics School, Mao, Shangmin (the school's other founder) around the money, and cast in hundreds of thousands of. "I really thought about it at that time, either."　　"Mao said.　　However, in the eyes of some public welfare practitioners, public organizations need to learn to "hematopoietic", even "income" than "learn to spend" more important, but also can make ordinary citizens realize that charity is also a cost, it will be the impact of more far-reaching charitable education. Condemn Wang Dan stingy? Maybe it was wrong. Wang Shi was "stingy" with his donation, but his response to the blog ——— "Vanke's Expert group has completed the Chengdu VankeThe safety appraisal of residential residents in residential area has been transferred to the appraisal of the urban buildings. Vanke is studying the rebuilding plan of the residential area in Sichuan earthquake Zone day and night. "——— also let us fall into deep meditation: is the money out of the end? What kind of charitable goals should be upheld?　　Can corporate philanthropy be combined with management? Sun Ziying, China market director at UBS Wealth Management, wrote a "prescription" in a column in global entrepreneurship. In his view, from participation, involvement in philanthropy to becoming an influential philanthropist, a committed philanthropist would probably go through three stages: "Green period". Philanthropists may have begun to intervene in public donations, but he has not yet incorporated these activities into a formal, systematic and sustainable structure.　　He may be making a comprehensive understanding of specific philanthropic needs, and he may be considering how to use his charitable donations more effectively, and how to form a similar "foundation" with a permanent carrier. "Initial period". Philanthropists have a general idea of what he wants to do for the public good, and seek help from his insiders or specific experts to better put his ideas into development strategy.　　At this point, he may begin to consider issues such as the legal compliance of the carrier, the specific project configuration and the asset management strategy of the donation. "Setting period". Philanthropists are in stark contrast to the first two categories. He has arranged and established his charitable carrier, but he has further needs at this time, and may need to improve the management structure and decision-making process of the carrier, or he will need to find his charitable focus again.　　What he needs may be experts on family governance strategies or investment decisions. Special articles: newspaper reporter Yu Tao Zhu Shanting related reports see C10-13 version