How to recover the domain name without reason

Intermediary transaction SEO diagnosis Taobao guest Cloud host technology Hall

"Baidu" a bit "domain name is lost", you can find relevant news about 821, including a recent "Overseas domain name deep management loophole crisis: Legal vacuum highlights" attention. This article is March 17 "Beijing business newspaper" reporter Mao Tao Tao wrote, narrated some recent years "Domain name missing" event.

Mao Tao Tao wrote the article mentioned, including the author I have been involved in the coordination of the "Tianya Domain name hijacked event." 5 years ago, the author saw the news introduction, immediately contacted in Beijing, Tianya president Xing, he said that has spent a lot of money but did not quite grasp the end, so the author met him, and then step by step to assist him to collect evidence, Later, at that time Tocows company Asia-Pacific general manager Fusionsun and then China Channel Shaofeng general manager of the intervention, basically about 60 affected domain name (in fact, more than the news of the tianyaclub.com a domain name) all frozen, the author has written 5 articles, is basically to correct the outside hype but the domain name controversy not know much of the popularization of knowledge of the article.

It turns out everyone knows: The two sides are reconciled. The key reason is that the other side did not have the bargaining chip, and I am obligated to assist the Xing President to complete this matter, in addition to professional experience, is based on the global domain name industry high level of good interpersonal relationships.

A client's QQ complained April 5, 2010, a "Domain name lost" event parties on QQ on the author complained about himself and some of the parties "domain name loss" Event process, he hoped that the author can write an article, "exposing the security of foreign domain names." However, the author explained to him that he could not confirm the authenticity of the facts he told, because it is a very complex issue of proof, to the author of media background is difficult to judge, so will not write a domain name lost case. In addition, I also give a few examples to illustrate:

1. Management vulnerabilities are not necessarily the result of a technical solution, which is like a knife maker's inability to assume the responsibility of a knife murderer;

2. The law is a coherent and direct responsibility, the author is a comparative law professional, know the difference between foreign law and Chinese law;

3. Even the bank, the Obama computer has also been invaded, baidu.com can be changed DNS, indicating that the world does not have an absolutely safe service system;

The 4.2007 meeting of the ICANN conference in Brazil released data: A daily occurrence of more than 270 large web site domain name hostage events;

5. Network security is a technology deployment based, each link must be attention to everyone will be effective behavior synthesis, that the mouth hanging every day on the Internet security will not have a loophole accident idea, is wrong.

Several steps to safeguard the rights of the following is the author from a lot of domain name hostage incident Report Small knot several steps to safeguard, for everyone's reference:

First of all, to check the vulnerability, that is, there is a loophole in the management of the domain name process, giving people the opportunity to fill in, in particular WHO and the registration board who differential school inspection, which is based on ICANN's Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) can directly to the ICANN legal commissioner to complain of evidence, In particular, the GTLD domain name, ICANN can be a complaint to open the Registrar.

Secondly, to retain the valid evidence, original proof of payment is the most important and effective evidence of the domain name owner.

Again, to seek institutional relief through agreement, including registration of successful notification mail (if not even this, the trap is actually paid that day exists), to the Registrar to inquire about the process of the mail, can prove that the dialogue between the two sides of the telephone recording. These evidences are submitted to the agents, registrars and registries for the purpose of seeking normal system relief, because the domain name is run again and cannot run out of the palm of the registry, and if the board does not handle it, it will lodge a complaint directly with the ICANN legal officer.

Finally, is to find media exposure, I think, in fact, this is the most unwise approach, if the media exposure will let the domain name run back to your own hands, it is the most naïve, lovely idea, its role I think the worst.