How to withstand the questioning of press spokesman

This newspaper special commentator Chonghong has the information open and the accountability system safeguard, the populace does not need to worry about being concealed, does not have to worry about no one to blame, will not be in the press conference that short time, will the request of the Government a brain to press the spokesperson.　　From the waves of public opinion out of the Wang, far away to Poland, his figure is still in the whirlpool of public opinion. Wang, the original spokesman for the Ministry of Education, said that the press secretary is actually doing two things: say good things, and put the bad stuff to good. "It's easy to say good things," said the spokesman, the restrictions on the icing on the cake, to make the leaders happy. "It is difficult to say bad things well," said the premise of "good" is open, put the facts to reason.　　The question is whether the facts can be made public, how openly, to what extent, let the public know at the same time, but also to the satisfaction of the leadership, really test the spokesperson's balance ability. Unfortunately, it is rare for a spokesperson to have such powers.　　Not enough of the Wang, but their "monologue" is difficult to make public opinion of the growing awareness of the right to be satisfied. The spokesman's system is meant to establish a communication channel, which is the institutional arrangement for public consultation, questioning and accountability of all issues directly related to the public interest, such as major government matters, major emergencies, public policies, public services and so on.　　It can be seen that the information disclosure and perfect accountability system is the prerequisite for the smooth implementation of the spokesman's system. With the protection of information disclosure and accountability, the public would not have to worry about being concealed, without fear of no one, and would not be able to press the demands of the government to the news spokesperson in the short time of the conference-even if the public did not ask, the system would start the accountability process and trace it.　　The spokesman also did not have to come forward, must put on a "Taibaodalan" heroism, in the press conference for the responsible leadership to plug loopholes-even if there is no clear statutory responsibility, the responsible person has long been automatically resigned. 7 23 Wenzhou train accident, the media's step-by-step press, the surge of public opinion, not against the Wang, but behind his representative of the organization or department. The leaders avoided, Wang had to come up to plug loophole Son.　　The question is, the surging cross-examine, is Wang a person can bear the heavy? Mr. Shinbin, a professor of Tsinghua University, who was in charge of the Chinese "Huangpu first issue" spokesman, sighed for his student Wang a press conference. The spokesman's "solo" is not only their lack of strong team support, but the lack of a stronger institutional support. How many people are actually being held accountable in the event of a major accident? How many of the officials who have been held accountable have been promoted offsite? In the case of the information openness system and the accountability system still seriously absent, how can the "monologue" of the Wang be so awkward and hasty?