is the external chain of submission really high quality?

Most webmasters say the chain may think that submission is the best way to get high quality outside the chain, but is it true? Do you get a good quality outside the chain? Then the author from three aspects and everyone to share, the external chain of contributions is really high-quality?

I. Submission site itself

Webmaster Most submissions will be cast to Admin5 and Chinaz (Webmaster's home) Right, first of all we know a little most of the sites that accept submissions are not supported on the description text and hyperlinks. Only one plain text link is supported. So is plain text links really useless? Baidu Lee gave the answer is this: can parse, can crawl. But! We want to know that plain text links can crawl, but basically do not crawl. Can parse! But does not pass the weight. Therefore, in addition to the contribution itself can expand visibility, it is not the weight of any transmission (is not valid outside the chain). I think social networking sites will do a lot better than such portals, if only to broaden their profile.

Second, reproduced the acquisition of the chain

We all know that the articles submitted to these two websites will basically change to a large number of reprinted! But do not know the site has been cast the webmaster did not notice, generally reproduced sites are some collection site, that is, some Baidu is very dislike of the site, then our article is reproduced to such a site will have a role? Not only is not effective, but a large number of increased garbage outside the chain may make our website to enter Baidu's assessment period. As for the user's reprint aspect. Ladies and gentlemen, how many people do you think will leave a link? Moreover, today's A5 and webmaster home are soft, in addition to the need I do not see how many people will go up to learn things.

Iii. Relevance Issues

Usually collection webmaster Home and A5 Webmaster network site are some webmaster class related sites. And many of our webmaster stations may have no relevance to these. Once the article is reproduced, are reproduced to some of the less relevant sites. Such an outside chain, the individual think it is also invalid outside the chain.

The chain of contributions may have been a good way to get a link in the past, but only in the past. I remember reading an article the main saying is: Do not be outdated SEO technology to delay. We need to know that now the webmaster home is not the former webmaster home, now Baidu is much smarter than before. Of course, the above points are also personal views, the actual situation, we still need to adjust according to actual practice.