is the fund rat position just a personal act?

Wu Junchang publicly reported that since 2006, the name Zhou Yi investors following the financing fund company's four funds appeared in the new middle base, Hainan Sea Medicine, Guangzhou Cooler, Sichuan shares of four stocks of the top ten circulating shareholders, profit has nearly 20 million yuan. The timing of their buying is generally in the financing system before the fund, in addition, also accurate copy of the system of the quilt, waiting for the financing of the Fund to pull out the solution.　　(May 13 "Beijing News") with the investment Morgan and the South Fund single fund individual fund managers involved in different, financing fund this suspected "rat storehouse" fund, including the new blue-chip fund, Qualcomm fund, financing power pioneer, intermediation 100 index and so on four, time span up to 3 years. If said, the has highlighted Morgan and the South fund Wang Limin "the mouse storehouse" is "the individual behavior" to be possible to understand, that this financing fund such large-scale, the long time suspected mouse Storehouse's fact, uses "the individual behavior" to qualitative, feared cannot justify. Financing fund is not large, open equity funds less than 10, nearly half of the funds suspected of "mouse warehouse", had to let people doubt whether the fund company in the management of omissions.　　After the incident, intermediation company has remained silent, with the disclosure of the case, the relevant truth will surface. From the has highlighted of Morgan, to the South fund Wang Limin, every time exposed rat storehouse, the fund company's rhetoric is "fund managers personal reasons", the people involved in the dismissal, abandoned car bao Shuai.　　From the management of the intermediation incident is a "personal behavior" of the qualitative to judge, this case of the Rat warehouse incident is still a cop-out, the end of the "individual officers" of the punishment, the relevant companies are safe. From the investment Morgan to the south to the financing, investors can not help but ask, the fund industry in the end how many mouse positions? If the incident is not reported by the media, I am afraid it is difficult to find out. Needless to be denied, there may still be a large number of rat silos that have taken more covert action.　　Last year, the amendment to the Penal Code added to the Fund insider trading measures, the relevant offenders will bear criminal responsibility, those desperate people, will be punished by law. But in the case of the repeated ban, the management of the fund company's accountability is always missing.　　Using investors ' money for illegal interests, the ultimate victim of rat Barn is the ordinary CDI, so far, we have not seen the fund company to investors a sincere "account". After the incident, the management still only proposed that "the fund company should strengthen the system construction, must strengthen to the investment management person's education" these nowhere near's retreat request, this may also be difficult to serve the public.