It giant copyright stick should not be taken lightly

Vegetable root Talk about the habit of the software "doctrine" attitude really let private entrepreneurs eat a lot of losses, in addition to the previous global IT giants Microsoft's typical "black screen" stick, some of the domestic small and medium-sized enterprises even suffered from the international giants of copyright litigation, most of the end because of being caught on the handle, had to settle or fine end, That litigation has become one of the most proven methods of international it giants.　　The reason is very simple, often after the lawsuit will reach two kinds of effect: one is Shanshi, let other enterprises take a lesson; second, indirectly guide the other enterprises to buy their own software products, to achieve performance promotion. There's been a recent, bizarre lawsuit worth paying attention to, global industrial design software giant, the United States parameter technology company will be the world's largest mouse manufacturer Kun Ying Company sued the court, the reason is very simple, that is, Kun Ying Taipei Corporation to the United States to purchase the original software Pro, in the absence of the parameters of the company written authorization, Part of the genuine software transfer to its wholly-owned subsidiary of Dongguan Kun surplus use.　　Arguably, if there is real evidence, the lawsuit will continue, but the development of the situation is not surprising to the defendant: because the parameters (China) did not pay the litigation fees, the local courts have to press the automatic withdrawal treatment. The result of such a lawsuit let Dongguan kun surplus this side depressed, if the other party does not take the initiative to withdraw, it means that Dongguan Kun Ying also at any time may become the defendant, more let Dongguan kun surplus is every time the software was detained after the company's losses will not be less than millions of yuan; On the other hand, Taiwan headquarters has purchased the Pro/ E software is the United States parameter Company's genuine software, just transferred to Dongguan subsidiary use.　　At this point, you have to go back to the parameter (China) company to buy software, in Dongguan Kun surplus seems to be difficult to swallow this tone. Here, we are not going to discuss the two sides in the end of which the reason is more adequate, after all, as the Taiwan and Hong Kong OEM enterprises in different regions of the use of genuine software triggered by the lawsuit, on the event itself, the court will eventually be conclusive. However, from the perspective of domestic enterprises, especially the small and medium-sized enterprises in the Pearl River Delta, once caught in this copyright dilemma, the development of enterprises will be very unfavorable, and even directly let these small and medium-sized enterprises face extinction.　　No matter what these it giants are for the consideration, as long as there is a handle in the hands of others, can only be allowed to bid by the other side, less tens of thousands of, more than millions of compensation. How to solve this problem? Obviously, the use of genuine software is the most basic, whether the software comes from a foreign country or is produced domestically, the chances of being a potential litigation client by a software vendor are much smaller; second, be cautious about buying software from the international It giants, see the relevant protocols carefully, and don't go through the history files until there's a problem.　　Other people stay in the hand, is a lot of hands, and finally, of course, to strive for their own rights, even if the other side is holding the name of the lawsuit to threaten the purchase of software, but also to weigh the end is not the compromise. Cai