Jinshan Network Shield v. 360 Unfair competition Victory 360 said will appeal

May 11 Afternoon news, Jinshan Network Shield Prosecution 360 forced unloading constitutes unfair competition in the case today, the Beijing First Intermediate People's Court sentenced 360 suspected improper and compensation Jinshan Network Shield 300,000 yuan.　　360 subsequently issued a statement that the case resulted from the gold Net shield infringement prior, and has filed an appeal. Court found 360 unfair competition compensation 300,000 yuan today in Beijing, a Chinese court to make public sentencing, the verdict showed that 360 constituted infringement, decree immediately stop all unfair competition behavior, compensation Jinshan 300,000 yuan loss costs,　　and 7 days in a row on the 360 official website on the home page to eliminate the negative impact on the Jinshan network Shield. The court said in the verdict, 360 security guards in their own installation and upgrade operation in the process of using pop-up prompt box, guide the user in the prompt box to agree to uninstall Jinshan Network Shield operation, the court said, although the Tip box also has uninstall 360 security Guardian Options,　　However, the dialog box only has to stop the Kingsoft Shield installation option and is selected by default, and uninstall the 360 security Guardian option is different from the uninstall Jinshan Network shield option settings.　　The court believes that the 360 security guards move is not to allow Internet users to choose freely, but with a clear bias, will be misleading to consumers. The Court further said that 360 security guards in the user was guided to uninstall Jinshan Network Shield, using a destructive way to remove Jinshan shield, subjective malicious obvious. The court found that 360 security guards violated the voluntary, the principle of equality, fairness, honesty and credit, which constitutes unfair competition 360 The lawsuit resulted from Jinshan Network Shield infringement of the first 360 company attorney Gao Song said, "The cause of this case is due to the Golden Hill company software infringement first, Qihoo 360 had to make the user risk prompt, The installation of Jinshan Shield will result in 360 security guard product function failure, user's computer will be in a compromised state, and will choose the right to install which software to the user. If 360 does not prompt to the user, is the most irresponsible behavior to the user. Gao Song said that in view of the court of First Instance's improper place, Qihoo 360 will appeal to the higher People's Court in Beijing.　　It is understood that Qihoo 360 as early as in November 2010 has been through the judicial approach to Jinshan Company's unfair competition, the case will be in the recent Beijing first Intermediate People's Court session. "Since the second half of 2009, Jinshan began to use its Jinshan Network Shield products, Qihoo 360 Company's 360 security defender software function to destroy, resulting in 360 security guards on Trojans or fraudulent Web site interception function can not work properly."　　"Gao Song said, Qihoo 360 through a variety of ways to communicate with Jinshan company, ultimately did not be resolved, and finally prompted the user related risks." Gao Song lawyer thinks, Qihoo 360 company was forced to stop with Jinshan Network Shield compatible, "this is entirely due to the Golden Hill tort first, odd Tiger 360 behavior is compelled to." and Qihoo 360 in the process of installation gave users full access to the right to know and choice, there is no so-called forced uninstall Jinshan Network Shield LineFor。 "(Lin)