KFC sells moldy burgers for 10 times times compensation

The court found that the restaurant to provide "not in line with food safety standards" food to make a first-instance verdict (reporter Wei correspondent Liu Huinan) Mr. Wang at KFC dinner, found that hamburger Edge has moldy, he will be sued KFC to court.　　It is reported that the Court found that KFC provided "not in line with food safety standards" of food, 10 times times the verdict of KFC compensation for consumer losses. Mr. Wang claims that at noon May 12, 2011, he dined at KFC's Anzhen Bridge restaurant at a point of two 15 yuan luxury lunch.　　Eating the second hamburger, he stumbled on the edge of the hamburger was moldy, so he took a hamburger to the point table, the manager on duty to give a statement. The manager explained that Mold point is the bread manufacturer's problem, has nothing to do with KFC.　　For the moldy burger, both sides were photographed at the first time. After the incident, Mr. Wang frozen the moldy hamburger in the fridge, and on the second day through the KFC official website to the KFC headquarters complained. KFC invited Wang was born May 15 to KFC Anzhen Bridge restaurant to resolve the matter.　　The two sides did not agree, because Mr. Wang insisted that the KFC side made a public apology.　　Mr. Wang thinks, KFC's behavior has violated the product quality law, the consumer Rights Protection Law related stipulation, therefore asks KFC to provide the bread examination conformity record, the written apology, the compensation property loss 300 yuan, the spiritual loss expense 1000 yuan, and bears the lawsuit expense.　　Beijing KFC Co., Ltd. said in the trial, the company has been to the staff on duty restaurant verification, the staff that the hamburger does not exist mildew problem, so the company believes that Mr. Wang's claim has no factual and legal basis.　　The court, under the Food Safety Act, "produces food that does not meet food safety standards or sells foods that are knowingly incompatible with food safety standards, in addition to claims for damages, consumers can also request the producers or sellers to pay 10 times times the price of compensation, the first instance of the decision to Beijing KFC Co., Ltd. compensation Mr. Wang 100 yuan.　　Judgment reason KFC has fault should be liable to the court after hearing that, KFC as a catering enterprises, should provide food safety requirements of food.　　According to the existing evidence can be found that KFC's food can not be eaten, in view of Mr. Wang's purchase of a hamburger on the suspected mildew point of foreign bodies, KFC should be the legal compensation for Mr. Wang's reasonable loss.　　Because Mr. Wang did not eat the hamburger, his rights and interests have not been further violated, so Wang advocated the company's written apology, compensation for spiritual loss of 1000 yuan lawsuit request lacks the legal basis, therefore does not support.　　KFC as a food seller, failed to carefully review its sale of food, so that consumers buy defective products, KFC has a fault, should bear the liability. Neither party appealed the verdict after the court's decision.