Land transfer gold is suspected of raising land price

(Reporter Xu Feng) July 1, Guangzhou will implement the new land transfer (ie "land premium") to collect standards, developers and citizens to improve the standard of premium will be greatly improved.　　Industry insiders believe that, although the city's Land and Housing Bureau response "policy is only to land premium standards and market prices linked, there is no push high prices," but in the current implementation of such measures, there are raised land prices, housing market suspicion. "Leasing" confused base land price according to the new standard of land premium, the Agreement transfer project (excluding industrial projects) building area or building use adjustment, the operational use of the current benchmark land price adjustment before and after the use of the standard calculation of the total difference adjustment of land transfer money. After the implementation of the policy, the land transfer only in accordance with the pre-sale of the land area to pay. July 1 After the Housing reform housing market, the replacement of land transfer gold according to the House transaction assessment price of 1%.　　Private housing expansion, amended, alteration, such as expansion after the building area of no more than the original property rights area of 5% (including), suspended Levy; more than 5% of the increase in the capacity of the land by the pure income of land transfer payment. Senior Real estate expert Han Shitong said that from the new standard, the land transfer and benchmark land price blurred. Most of the land transfer money refers to the land sold by the public auction, and the benchmark land price is the standard for the transfer of land to the government to pay the premium.　　If the two are confused, it is difficult to distinguish and misleading. He analyzed, now this land transfer Gold collection standard, in fact, is not aimed at public racket linked to deal with the land transfer money. Because the public bid to hang this part of the land transfer gold standard is not required by the government pricing, but by the market price. For example, the highest residential land in Zhujiang New town is 15,000 yuan/square meters, and the floor premium of the tallest residential plots in the university city is 9500 yuan/square meters.　　In February this year, Guangzhou announced the latest benchmark land price is much lower, such as the Pearl River New Town residential base land price of 4804~5191 yuan/square meters, the university city housing benchmark land price of 3016~3078 yuan/square meters, the public sale of land price is far higher than the benchmark price. The new standard has raised the land price suspicion China famous real estate expert Chen Jincheng pointed out that in the current introduction such measures, has raised the land price, entrust the housing market suspicion. This is also a lot of local thinking of the city. Knowing that the market actual land price level has been far higher than the benchmark land price, but also raised the benchmark land price in this period, nothing more than to the developers and other markets to release such news: "If you do not buy the land in time, then the future price will rise."　　"In other words, the government wants to raise the benchmark land price to convey the signal, in the hope that it affects market price expectations, the price will affect price expectations." Guangzhou Land and Housing Bureau recently responded, the new policy is only to land premium standards and market prices linked to the phenomenon of pushing up prices. Zhongyuan Real Estate Project general manager Huang recently said that the new policy after the developers to pay the premium will greatly increase the cost of the developer premium may be doubled four or five times times. Chen sincerely believes that this will enable developers to support or lift the market land price or premiumPeriod, and ultimately to raise the price of the purpose. But there are different points of view, the Guangdong Provincial Housing association director Chao Chowen recently said, because the current legacy of historical sites accounted for a small proportion, so the new approach will not interfere with the current land market, will only make the market more equitable, more standardized.