Links, in fact, is very hurtful

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

For the exchange of links, is indeed a very troublesome thing, although the friendship, but 99.9% of the links are links to link.

Search engines have killed "friendship" to some extent.

The world's most famous, most authoritative search engine Google also no taboo to say: "As long as your external links enough, I will give you the ranking!" ", and a small green ruler (PageRank) to measure this standard, the world's seoer started crazy, webmaster also crazy." Commonly known as "friendship link" actually became "SEO link", the webmaster will be clear to tell you, my friendship link is to get more links.

The little link makes Google, and it brings a lot of trouble.

How to ensure that the ranking of objectivity and accuracy is Google has been the direction of efforts, the so-called villains, outsmart, as if to link launched the attack and defense war! Forcing Google to make a no follow, has always been praised as a technology strongman Google also does not have to bow to spam.

Starting from the sociological analysis, this link-based search engine algorithm does exist some objectivity, but once used by people becomes a mishap. Cannot heal unless it can be replaced by a more reasonable algorithm mechanism. If Google, like Baidu, take a hair-pulling policy, I think a lot of websites will be very depressed.

True friendship link is actually a kind of appreciation

I think Google's original intention should also be like this, remember a few days ago and Zac Exchange links, he mentioned, and I link and PR and so are irrelevant, because the content of the blog is OK, so it added. So I think there are some problems in our understanding of links.

What exactly is the true friendship link? I think Flypig's point of view is enlightening.

If my site points to an authoritative site is not good?

I believe a lot of seoer have done experiments on this, and so do I, but I have no confidence in this experiment to remain objective. Because will be affected by a lot of factors, such as domain name, content, page level, external link source, etc., if these are unified, it is bound to create similar problems, I am depressed to think: Search engine will think exactly who similar who ...

This question I want to have a lot of aspects of consideration, in any case whether there is the benefit of the truth can be said to make sense, the people do not upset!

Am I going to be scrap metal?

There is an SEO once said: "If your PR is 5, you have the only external link to me, then this link is more precious than gold!" If more words is scrap iron. ”

This sentence is not wrong, but some webmaster misinterpreted as: "If I give you the link, my page weight will be reduced" (not the exact words, but the meaning is this).

In fact, this is completely a misunderstanding, if you have more external links, for you linked to the site will be reduced voting, will not affect their early. In that case, hao123 cannot have such a high page weight. (hao123 in a lot of keywords standing good rankings, you can use Google to experiment)

Finally remind everyone, do friendship link to be careful where!

Statement: This copyright belongs to SEO enthusiasts-jiangnan sky all, if you need to reprint please keep this statement with this site link.