Luo vs Wang Free debate Summary, the two sides confront 10 key points

class= "Post_content" itemprop= "Articlebody" >

Hammer Phone founder Luo and independent evaluation agency Zealer founder Wang freely on-site confrontation, as promised. As a new mobile phone brand, hammer and Luo by virtue of "feelings", "serious", "craftsmen" and other labels to capture the eye, life and death in this is already a blood of the smart phone industry to kill a path. and Zealer and freely also in the last two years of mobile phone evaluation by virtue of "professional", "objective" and other labels, become the most influential evaluation of the Organization ...

Previously, the two people in the micro-blog relationship is very close and friendly. However, the relationship between the two men deteriorated rapidly with the advent of the Zealer Hammer T1 evaluation video. According to netizens, the overall evaluation of the video is quite negative for the hammer, and a "You can be serious, but not capricious" is to put the relationship between the two people to a tense situation.

There are netizens and insiders suspected that zealer because of the millet, OPPO and other industries in the mobile phone companies, and made a negative evaluation. and Zealer and freely I clearly deny this speculation.

What is the objective or not? The author does not speculate motives, this article will be summed up this confrontation in the ten key information points, to be judged by netizens.

1. Overall Impressions: Lao Luo is strong and logical and full of humility without justification

In the overall confrontation, it is clear that Luo mastered the rhythm, and the logic is complete and ready. From the large cardboard PPT can be seen, Luo's thinking logic is, first set out freely evaluation is not so professional, there is a lot of mishap, secondly, the Zealer video has deliberately "black" suspicion, again that zealer investors are mobile phone companies, can not be objective, while attacking Zealer Maintenance services for orders from the gray channel, there is a suspicion of illegality.

In a relaxed way, the beginning of a humble response, and then unable to control the debate. In the process of being interrupted again and again, and following the logic of old Luo, there is no justification at all.

2. The lost debate and the significance of confrontation

For the two companies and two people who also advertised idealism, this debate can not lose, if lost, the old lost is the product, Wang freely lost is the evaluation of the value of No. Both have defended themselves in their respective positions.

And the significance of confrontation, as the United States "presidential debate" in the same sense, no one can convince who? The key is to convince the audience in front of the television. This confrontation, the most important thing is to talk with the computer users before.

3. The fragile

of the hammer

For this, Mr Lo admits that the hammer is one of the most fragile handsets at the moment. At ease, the hammer should improve its robustness, and the old man insists that for the sake of beauty, the fragile nature should not be a test point for a mobile phone or a good one, and take an example of an iPhone 4来.

4. Fuselage structure sponge and heat dissipation problem

In the evaluation video, it is considered that the sponge in the fuselage hinders the heat dissipation of the machine. But the old Luo thinks, the increase of sponge actually increases the heat conduction and heat dissipation effect precisely.

5.

of line and assembly process complexity

Freely in the evaluation video, said that the line exists in the machine folding 20 percent, resulting in complex assembly. In the case of Foxconn, the old man said that modern-day factories would have professional equipment to solve these problems without increasing the complexity.

6. Electrostatic problem

Free to take out the test report said, hammer phone anti-static not up to national standards. Mr. Luo said that this issue needs to go back to confirm the study, if there is a problem, then admit the mistake, improve, and warranty to the end.

7. screen visual angle suspense and brightness problem

In this part, the old Luo said he was free to use shooting angle deliberately "black" hammer. The same JDI screen, three shots of different angles, led to the hammer in the most disadvantageous position, thus inducing the user to form the wrong judgment. At ease, this is the staff's unintentional, while insisting that the visual angle of the hammer screen is not as good as the other machines in the evaluation.

And the same about the screen brightness problem, freely think hammer phone level is not good, and old Luo think they have been used in addition to Apple Samsung outside the best screen, no problem.

8. Camera white balance and purple edge problem

Old Mr Luo says, the camera automatic algorithm has the very big instability. The reviewers deliberately change their perspective, and can draw purposeful results. The controversy over this issue will be validated by actual reality shots.

9. About independent and Third-party

Lao Luo disclosed Zealer investment side for Millet, OPPO, VIVO, Gionee four domestic manufacturers, since there are manufacturers to invest, it is not independent, third party. It is easy to insist that, because the manufacturers do not have the right to vote, Zealer is independent.

10. On grey channels and business ethics

Mr Lo points out that the accessories used for Zealer maintenance services are obtained from Apple's grey channels, and this is illegal. And feel comfortable with the current industry status quo, he promised to take the goods from the supplier is legal, as for the supplier is how the gray channel, he can not control.

At the same time, Mr. Luo said the hammer asked Zealer to make a paid consultant and pointed out many problems. Then I said there was no problem, and then I did a video review to point out the new problem. In this respect, Lao Luo said this practice is against commercial ethics.

Luo the king of the Rhetoric