Mandatory relocation is provided that the person should be compensated first

Xinhua Beijing, January 28 (reporter Chenfi, Chi Qingxin) for the government in the process of housing, the most likely to cause conflicts in the "forced relocation" issue, 29th formally sought public opinion of the "state-owned land on the expropriation and Compensation regulations (draft)" gave clear provisions. The draft stipulates that the person to be levied and the interested party concerned with the decision of the house expropriation may apply for administrative reconsideration in accordance with the law and may also bring administrative action to the People's Court in accordance with the law, and not stop the execution of the compensation decision during the administrative reconsideration and administrative proceedings.　　, the local people's governments at or above the county level shall forcibly relocate or apply to the people's Court for compulsory relocation, if the administrative reconsideration is not filed or the administrative proceedings are not brought to the people's Court.　　The draft also stipulates that before the implementation of the compulsory relocation, the Housing collection Department should be in accordance with the compensation decision, the person to be charged with monetary compensation or the provision of property rights swap houses, turnover room. "The public interest is difficult to achieve if the government department collects and compensates for housing and is legitimate, but some people are unwilling to move away." Wang Xi, a professor at Peking University Law School, says the existence of "coercive measures" is reasonable at this time because all laws have a mandatory problem. But at the same time, coercion is a means of law, and it must be in accordance with the basic principles of the rule of law and cannot be equated with violence and some barbaric ways.