Millet 3 Thoughts record surprise and reflection for a fever

The official introduction of millet 3, so many people on its mixed, a mobile phone's true best-selling or not, there are too many determinants, millet 3, after the formal advent, or let everyone see the major in the hardware of millet upgrade, but the perfunctory data or because of the 1999 yuan pricing so that users believe that millet is still a fever and health! As a millet 1 and 2S users, I saw millet 3 time brain out of three keywords is-big, thin, Lumia. The first impression is very important, but inevitably superficial. After using Millet 3 for a week, I have more ideas about the new flagship of Millet. I summed them up as: a conjecture, 1 surprises, and a question. 1 guesses why is millet 3 so like Lumia? After the reaction from the Millet 3 conference, the expected "monster class" configuration did not set off too much waves, but millet 3 shape resembles the Nokia Lumia series and is criticized. A coincidence? Fools know it's impossible. But policymakers, who have managed to value 10 billion of their companies in three years, are equally unlikely to be fools. First, the Nokia Equipment and services Department was acquired by Microsoft at the beginning of the month. At the time of Stephen Allop's Elop "Trojan", we naturally heard some fans say "wishes" countless times-well, how good was it to embrace Android? Millet, of course, knows. Therefore, whether Millet intends to use such a simple rough way to achieve (at least) this part of the crowd's "desire", it is worth pondering. The advantage of this is "low risk, high efficiency". Millet's mainstream user base, not spit rice 3 plagiarism technology enthusiasts, but highly value "cost-effective" smartphone starter players. That is to say, really care about Millet 3 "plagiarism" people, would not buy millet 3, and buy millet 3 people, do not mind whether with Lumia very much like, even they may even Lumia for what all do not know. Not everyone is a millet consumer, so millet only need to catch it can attract that part of the crowd, it is enough. 1 a surprise after the cover finally no longer squeak ah ground rang. Aside from the controversial design, what about Millet 3? I have been using millet 1 and millet 2S for a long time, the most dissatisfied place is: the back cover always squeak Ah, the key is not too hard or too soft to start the feeling is always very cheap Finally, millet 3 in this area of progress, from the present point of view is gratifying. Integrated fuselage, very compact no sound, solid button feel, found a good balance. In these feelings improved, millet 3 also has a trace of "tall" temperament. A friend of this evaluation way: "Look at a bit of grass root (cock silk)." "This sentence seems to be saying, millet should look cock silk point, just accord with its temperament." Three years, 1999 yuan for Millet, is not only a gold medal, but also a baggage. The gold medal is to say, under such hardware configuration and price, you cannot in other respects ask tooMore, just make it. And the baggage, it is said if the "dare" to high-end after millet, will encounter a small resistance. When it comes to quality and workmanship, it has been said that these things have to be stretched out before they can be seen. Products produced by different manufacturers, initially see no difference. But a long time, the work of solid still rock, jerry-cut natural problems frequency. The long term performance of millet 3 in terms of quality is clearly not quite right. But to be sure, the feeling of millet 3 this time, more reliable than before. 1 Questions screen big, miui How did not move? Compared with the apparent improvement of external sensation, Millet's another "fist"--MIUI performance is not satisfactory. The most obvious feeling is that system optimization has not been done, the use of a period of time will have a system of the phenomenon of Kaka. However, as the Millet 3 is still in the engineering stage, this is not known. I am more concerned about the MIUI in the face of millet 3 this big screen when the interaction problem. The charm to MX3 's slogan is "better use of large screen mobile phones", FlyMe 3.0 for the large screen made a number of interactive improvements. However, the MIUI, which has always been intimate and easy to use, has not been released as a new feature of the big screen optimization with the Millet 3 release. It can be said that the current version of Miui did not keep pace with the hardware of millet mobile phone, making the experience of Millet 3 discount. Screen 5 inches, no very narrow border, the fuselage side of the arc design and support the fuselage width-one hand holding millet 3, to ensure that the thumb can press to the bottom of the screen three touch keys, the thumb cover area of about only one-third of the screen. Obviously, without system optimization and assistance, it is difficult to do most of the work with one hand. Not to mention the "application level" operation, such as using Sina Weibo official client sent a micro-blog, but "system-wide" large screen optimization of the lack of confusion. To give the simplest example: the dropdown notification bar is I use the big screen mobile phone to feel the most inconvenient system operation, but whether it is MIUI, or flyme, currently have not joined can use a single hand to complete the quick operation. But in fact, Moto's machines, including some third-party launcher, had a long way to go--to drop the notification bar by gesturing down the screen. As for MIUI, there is no movement, perhaps in the "Big Recruit." Finally, in general, this millet 3, hardware and software are more "unexpected." But the former is beyond expectations, and the latter, is not up to expectations. But then again, millet this company has been for 3 years has been slow-like hardware, configuration, the effect of immediate, natural to quickly release eye-catching, and software, experience, need to slow down, even if there is a problem, can be released after the upgrade to solve the impact is not. Just in this turbulent market, we see too many opportunistic, but rarely really breathe the innovation, and create. This is obviously not in the "gimmick" of the new features, but not in addition to what the money can not make the market skills. In contrast, those that allow you to save a single point in your day-to-day operationsThe technical improvement of the second may not be so noticeable, but it is the thing that really builds "experience mansion". From the market point of view, Millet is undoubtedly very successful. But between "success" and "greatness", it is innovation and creation that separates. And I think that innovation and creativity, sometimes not a matter of ability, but a choice?