Millet phones with high-pass chips resume sales in India

The news of the ban on millet in India is also below. According to NDTV, the Delhi High Court informed Millet to continue to sell red M 1S and red m note 4G before February 5, 2015.

Although Lei on Weibo said it was the best birthday present he had received. But the fact that it was a temporary lifting of the ban did not mean that the patent dispute between Millet and Ericsson was resolved. Ericsson, which initiated a patent lawsuit, said in an official statement:

"Millet can continue to import the mobile phone based on Qualcomm chip to India under the precondition of satisfying the 100 Indian rupee in advance for each equipment." In future hearings, all the defendants ' claims will be dismissed. Millet needs to obtain Ericsson's patent authority for all handsets it sells to India.

Millet access to temporary lifting of the red meter 1S and red meter note 4G are equipped with Gaotong Dragon 400 processor version, and the version of MTK chip is still unable to sell. This once again proves the role of the "high-pass umbrella".

The so-called "high-pass umbrella" refers to Qualcomm and mobile phone companies to sign a patent licensing agreement, the provisions of the mobile phone companies to the relevant patents for free reverse authorization to Qualcomm, and may not use these patents to sue Qualcomm's other customers. The burgeoning mobile phone brands such as millet are often considered to be the beneficiaries of a "high-pass umbrella".

So a large number of patents, such as Huawei ZTE, have an opinion on the "Qualcomm Umbrella", Yu yesterday at the Glory 6 Plus conference:

"Huawei has tens of thousands of patents and a lot of cross licensing, but it still pays a lot of money to other patent holders every year, much higher than its peers." In addition to the domestic industry to pay Qualcomm, not to any patent holders, such a market is very unfair, Huawei Terminal is also unfair. ”