Most southern textile investors do not know the right to claim the rights of the lawyer said the three mistaken

In Thursday, the public Securities and financial network of the South spinning shares (market, inquiry) The case of a false statement was reported. And in the subsequent communication with some of the readers concerned, the reporter found that many investors in the recognition of the claim misunderstanding.　　In response to the problems in the claim process, the Beijing surplus law firm Shili Laws Division has been explained. Misunderstanding one: If the shares are not lost, they cannot claim the South spinning shares for example, the two-tier market share price has been strong and performed better this year, and some investors who held the shares since March 27, 2012 (The disclosure date of the irregularities) have not suffered losses, so investors feel they have no right to claim such a situation. In fact, the truth is not. According to some provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the trial of civil compensation cases caused by false statements in the securities market, there is a base date for calculating the loss of investment in dealing with the stock claim. This base date refers to the date of revelation or correction date, to 100% of the cumulative turnover of the securities affected by the misrepresentation. If the investor buys and holds to the base date before the disclosure date, does it have a loss, not comparing its selling price to the bid rate, but comparing it with the prices of the shares between the date of the misrepresentation and the base date.　　South spinning shares, for example, after the revelation date of 100% of the day is October 31, 2012, as long as the investor's bid price and March 27 to October 31 compared with the closing price of the loss, you can determine that investors have the right to claim. Misunderstanding two: The stock has sold can not claim some investors think, although they because of South spinning shares fraud damage, but later has sold, is willing to gamble defeat, also lost the right to claim accordingly. Laws that investors who had been damaged by the fraud had the right to claim it, regardless of whether they sold the shares after the disclosure date. Brokerage department can print the bill, enough evidence. "For the past 20 years, I have been doing investor risk education, telling you that stocks are risky." But there is no investor protection education to tell them where to claim.　　"said Shili. Mistake three: The claim cost is very high Zang lawyer said that many people know that they have the right to claim, but feel that their chances are not high, the cost of the claim is high, so unwilling to claim. In practice, however, this is also an unclear process for investors to claim. It is true that the trial cycle of the claims is usually lengthy and many areas to be taken into account. But investors themselves don't have to spend much time coping. After the investor has provided the necessary proof, the other work is done by the lawyer, and the investor does not need to follow up the whole process. As for the cost of money, the vast majority of securities rights lawyers are now using the risk agent model. In other words, the lawyer is not in the early collection of legal fees, but from the end of the case to be divided into reparations. If the case loses, the lawyer does not charge. The lawyer was rewarded for winning the case. For investors, the cost of money is not high. "The Supreme People's CourtSome provisions on the trial of civil compensation cases caused by false statements in the securities market were introduced in 2003, but there are not many investors to know so far. Today, the relevant departments should pay more attention to investor protection education. "Shili said.