Mr Ho's conversations with lawyers confirm legal action

Mr Ho and his lawyer dialogue video record: Mr Ho and Oldham lawyer three dialogues short film content Ho ho Giants home become confusing parties statement contradictions (figure) two or three rooms also have gambling king video family competition for the outbreak of VCR and Sina Entertainment gambling King Stanley Ho on behalf of Lawyers Oldham, January 31 5 o'clock in the afternoon meeting with the media, 3 separate video footage of the alleged transfer of shares with Ho Ho and confirmation of legal action were held in public on January 25, January 26 and January 30.　　The footage was carried out in the dining room at Ho Ho's mansion in Qianshuiwan, where he answered the lawyer in English with a clear line of thought, understood Oldham's questions, and was able to answer in clear language, with four voices believed to be heard. The video of 25th this month, Ho Ho described the controversy as a robbery, and referred to the high still as his solicitor, demanding the continuation of the lawsuit against Fang and the three-room members.　　He was very saddened by the incident and hoped that the proceedings would bring the family back to the negotiating table.　　The 26th video of this month, Mr Ho refers to the chaos of the dispute, the television interview arranged by the three bedrooms is under pressure to videotape, and the high is still his solicitor, and it is his wish to sue the Fang and the three-room members in the hope of distributing the property equally to four rooms. In a video clip on 30th, Mr Ho said three wife refused to attend a family meeting and asked Oldham to take action to force the other party to surrender and return all Lanceford shares.　　Mr Ho, who was in the middle of a fragment, was disappointed by the incident and agreed that he was still his solicitor.　　Oldham said that the last fragment was recorded near noon on 30th, and that Ho Ho was awake and able to make clear instructions on the video, and that there were no family, care, independent lawyers and bodyguards present, and no instructions were given to Ho ho to answer the question. Oldham stressed that he only represented Mr Ho and had nothing to do with Mrs He Jia Shi, and that the proceedings would continue. In addition, Gao Hope 31st night and Ho Ho meet, also refers to what the requirements have not changed, has been hoping to get back the Lanceford of the equity allocation.