Recently, the Millet box music as the subject of compensation for the issue of music has attracted much attention today, LeTV website operations group CEO Fei said to Netease Finance, millet company response to the loss is to evade the light, "Millet had been worthy of respect, after the losing should be frank Face, bear the corresponding responsibilities and obligations, but now seems irresponsible. "This week, LeTV also will continue to dozens of exclusive movie and television infringement copyright lawsuits.
Beijing Haidian court ruled that the millet box infringed the "Seventeen Chains of Jinling", "I am a special soldier" and other seven films and television network information dissemination rights to the music video compensation 150,000 yuan. In response to the verdict, the company responded in a statement on June 30 that the millet box accessed the iCNTV platform, which was managed by iCNTV and source compliance. Millet and iCNTV future TV together, the first instance verdict on the facts and legal application of communication and consideration, in due course decide whether to appeal. In the afternoon, millet also made a statement, broke the news LeTV box and TV products in broadcast control and video content has not strictly abide by the management requirements of radio and television, iCNTV future TV has terminated the relationship with the music as the company's license.
Goof believes that millet's terminals, websites, forums flooded a large number of direct pirated content is a well-established fact that its violations have been fixed, and millet in response to the loss is deliberately avoid the light. He pointed out that the infringement of millet through the iCNTV platform is only a part of it, and that there are many infringing content that has nothing to do with iCNTV. Goofy said that this week, LeTV will continue to dozens of exclusive movies and TV dramas copyright infringement lawsuit. It is reported that LeTV has more than 500 pieces of evidence obtained as a result of an exclusive film and television drama.
For this case litigation deliberately "let off" the licensee side iCNTV, high-flying denied negotiations with the licensee party discourse right, he pointed out that although the license side are in the system, but there are also peer competition, the future does not exclude the private licensee to enter The possibility of. "If there are 7 license plates in the future and only 5 video websites, the right of discourse is shifted, which is a dynamic game, and LeTV will not be forced to accept unequal policies in the future."
As for the opinion that the development of LeTV in recent years, including the development of the TV set-top box, Internet TV and the upcoming mobile terminal in the plagiarism of Xiaomi, Goofy categorically denied that he said: "LeTV and Xiaomi plagiarism do not exist, In terms of television, the music as announced on September 19, 2012 do TV, millet no move; 2013 music as the official launch of TV products millet has not yet launched a similar product; music is also the world's first Qualcomm chips used in smart TVs Products. "He believes that the Internet, television and mobile terminals have formed a cross-platform chain," manufacturers can move the back of the TV can also be the opposite, which is a natural derivative, will eventually go by the same route. Because Xiaomi made a mobile phone, and music as the future may do cell phones, it is arbitrary to say that music as a plagiarism millet.
As for the relationship between LeTV and Xiaomi, the competitor and defendant, Gao Fei concluded with "borrowing" that "it is impossible for Xiaomi not to evaluate, refer to and study the situation of LeTV while it is doing TV, for which we have enough Confidence, while music as a mobile terminal, millet will be a good reference.
In addition, the State Administration of Press, Publication, SARFT recently rectified the "box" of television network video and welcomed it as the copyright owner's LeTV. Gao Fei said: "We can not say that we are relying on the system's dividend. However, the rectification of the regulation of the Internet Very useful. "Goof calls some of the non-copyrighted platforms known as" thieves for no apparent reason. "" They block your ads, but they also say "we create value for our users." In fact, it is destroying the industry's ecology "