Nanjing Tian Jie prosecution media who is to block the right to reasonable questioning the media accomplices

September 6 This year, Nanjing Tian Jie to a Chinese news network, and an activist weekly two media to send the relevant information, claiming that two of the media reported misrepresentation, the company caused a loss of reputation, and to seek compensation for its loss costs hundreds of thousands of yuan. In recent years, the role of public opinion supervision is more and more obvious in social life, and the expectation of supervision is greater than any time. However, when people feel the power of supervision of public opinion, a phenomenon that can not be neglected is spreading, that is, some people or enterprises do not respect journalists and the media, and intend to stifle the supervision of the media, such as corporate journalists and media incidents. Some time ago, "economic observer" reporter Qiu because of the report of the listed company Kane company related Transactions Insider, by the company's location in Zhejiang Lishui Suichang County Public Security Bureau on the internet wanted to let people fear, and then appear to the media of the yuan, however, now in this series of events remaining temperature, About Nanjing days Jie to sue the media and began to stir in the network.　　As we all know, the media is the eyes of the people, can play a role in the supervision of the public opinion, but why has it become a defendant again and again? It is worth pondering whether it means that the supervision of media opinion will be gradually deprived in the background of these media lawsuits.　　Nanjing Tian Jie to sue two media?　　It is understood that the September 6 this year, Nanjing, a news network in China, and an activist weekly two media sent the relevant information, claiming that two of the media reported misrepresentation, the company caused a loss of reputation, and to seek compensation for its loss costs hundreds of thousands of yuan. It is understood that the cause of the controversy was first in June this year, a rights weekly activist published a title entitled "Circulating Water treatment" of the shady Nanjing days Jie water treatment was questioned? "the report is widely reproduced on the Internet, the report questioned the existence of the Nanjing Tian Jie exaggerated propaganda, false advertising, the addition of toxic drugs and other acts. Since then, Nanjing Tian Jie has not been questioned by the media to do any written clarification, after the weekly in order to let the truth of the matter surfaced, so once again published a title "Nanjing Days Jie" scam door "Eddy Netizen questioning voice?" "Follow-up report, hoping to cause the Nanjing Tian Jie and the industry's attention, however,　　It is precisely because of this kind of justice behavior of the weekly caused an unnecessary news lawsuit. According to the relevant users in the linked street network can be seen, and more heinous is, a news network only to the Netizen reported matters and Nanjing Tian Jie did a preliminary check, from beginning to finish has not published relevant content. It is hard to believe that such a verification of the reporting matter is also a defendant.　　Nanjing Tian Jie such a waste of national judicial resources is too much to accept the people.　　Nanjing Tian Jie The Daw? For the Nanjing Day Jie to sue two media in the network upload, many netizens to the event launched hot discussion. "Does the media have no right to question?" "," the media questioned is also based on the Nanjing days Jay claimed to have more than 1000 customers, and then changed to more than 1000 times, this is not misleading publicity it? "," Nanjing Tian JieI didn't admit it. Due to the air conditioning water into the living tank led to the collective accident of Nanjing Library staff, the reporter in the brand observation network, street networking and other major websites to see a lot of netizens on this matter for hot discussion. From the overall situation, the majority of netizens expressed support for the media, a netizen said, because the reporter was threatened, the media was blocked, the media defendants and other things have occurred, causing many of our country crisis events, the media appear collective failure phenomenon, many media seemingly self-preservation, but actually lost the courage to face the truth.　　Netizens have argued that it is necessary to strengthen the supervision of public opinion and encourage more media to be able to challenge and criticize enterprises or individuals who have harmed the public interest. Industry: The media has a reasonable right to question the industry said that the media is not the public authority, on any fact itself, its entry into the same as an ordinary natural person is not mandatory, so it has a reasonable right to challenge. Today, the media on the Nanjing Day Jay raised the query is not unfounded, as many netizens questioned, Nanjing days in the relevant statement of the claim that their products have not used sodium nitrite, but explicitly admit their own air conditioning water into the life tank led to the collective accident of Nanjing Library staff, As for the specific cause of the accident, Nanjing Tian Jie failed to provide relevant proof and witness, the ambiguous response had to be questioned by the media and many netizens, and, second, when the media questioned its use of the Nanjing University of Technology award certificates and equipment for false publicity, Nanjing Tian Jie also failed to provide relevant written proof, in this case,　　What is wrong with the media's questioning? Finally, the Nanjing Day Jay said there are more than 1000 users, after the statement changed to more than 1000 times, so inconsistent reaction, it is no wonder that there are netizens suspected of playing word games, confusing the public! The industry said that, as citizens become more and more legal awareness, the news media as a result of the supervision of public opinion reports and became the defendant, in order to reduce the news lawsuit, better protect the media itself, some media supervision reports blurred by the name of the criticized object, which will lead to many industries outlaws opportunistic, Damage the public interest, also can not play the media supervision of public opinion.　　To this end, the industry suggested that the media should adhere to the principle of news reporting, to strengthen their sense of responsibility, the courage to the corporate chaos, social adverse phenomenon of questioning. Expert advice: Enterprises should respect the supervision of news and public opinion is well-known, the media to report the facts objectively and fairly, on the one hand, to meet the public's right to know, on the other hand to achieve the news supervision function, but many media often end up with a villain, some reporters, editors were forced to stand in the dock, They also have to spend a lot of energy in the endless press litigation, so some experts suggest that enterprises should correctly deal with the rights of public opinion supervision. The expert thinks, the enterprise resists the news public opinion supervision is also resists the populace to supervise, will have the damaging effect to own good image, opposite enterprise if can treat the news public opinion supervision correctly, takes the positive attitudeShould be questioned by consumers and public opinion, not only may be in their own products do not have defects in the case of maintaining their own product reputation, but also conducive to shaping the consumer and society responsible for the good corporate image.