News reporter bursts Microblogging response Yeking accusations that the source is conclusive

"Beijing Times" on the Jay Weibo click to see "Beijing Times" reporter Yuje Weibo >>> Sina Entertainment News last night (February 15, 2011), was hit director Yeking on Sina Weibo published 37 consecutive articles in response to its "extramarital" report, Denounced the reporter's source of improper and his own in the aftermath of the horror. Today (February 16), Yeking in the article to blame the story of the "Beijing Times" reporter Yuje, through the Sina Micro-blog Bursts 21 statements, the Yeking of the accusation one by one to respond. Yuje said the source, Beijing Chaoyang District Procuratorate outside the propaganda department, I did not have any fabrication. The following is a reporter Yuje Micro-blog content: The first: Early received a colleague phone said @ Beijing leaf director for my micro-blog and a piece of paper to question the microblog. Look, Fourier's microblog mentions me and the legal Evening News a reporter's manuscript, leaves the guide to me to carry on the accusation and the abuse.　　I will explain the situation in relation to me and my manuscript, so that you can understand the truth. Second: January 10, 2011 10:21, I and other 20 dozen political and political reporters received the publicity department of Chaoyang District, Beijing, issued two cases, "latent rules to sneak out of jail," and "well-known directors were gang fights, reason for extramarital affairs", I reported the second article, And to upload the main content of the second message Weibo. (Response to Yeking accused of the seventh article: Comrade Yuje, you must not say that you reported that it is not me, this is not your due quality, your blog has time, location, occupation, there is evidence, there is a plot, in China you can not find a second director to change the subject. What I want to ask is, which procuratorate? Who is the Honorable prosecutor, my Lord? Or which level of the public prosecutor's press release agency to disclose to you??? Third: The public prosecutor's office to disclose the case has strict procedures, to borrow the name of the public Prosecutor's Office to publish false information, I hate you as much as you do. For this matter, I can tell you that the source is a regular channel, from the Public Prosecutor's Office outside the propaganda department. (in response to Yeking accused of the eighth article: I know, the people's Procuratorate on the case of the disclosure of strict procedures and systems, no one, any organ, have no right to use the name of the people's Procuratorate to publish false information, especially fabricated facts false people's mouth public directly infringement of the right to the reputation of You said that I last year in a golf car park by So-and-so hired the murderer of my case, the public prosecution organ is Chaoyang District people's Procuratorate. Fourth: Time, place I have said before, please see for yourself. The main content excerpt 1 "will be paid after a seizure, its account, his wife in 2009 in the victim director of the TV series as the main actor, and the victim had an extramarital affair, after the victim repeatedly sent text messages harassing his wife, disturbing their family life" ( In response to Yeking accused of the Nineth article: if the Office of the Prosecutor to your senior law reporter disclosed, please publicly inform the disclosure of the time, place and main content. The second one is in your blog, "2009 years the Director and his guide to a major actress in the TV series ", in this respect, I and hundreds of millions of netizens to your public report of the so-called" sex "there is no misunderstanding and objections, please do not reiterate that you only refer to working relationship and eating relationship. Fifth: The main content excerpt 2 prosecutors suggested: because of their irresponsible family, the indulgence of their own emotional life, the victims not only suffered from being beaten, the consequences of property losses, but also led to the misfortune of two families. Family life is important to everyone, so you should cherish your family and be cautious about extramarital feelings. (in response to Yeking accused of the Nineth article: if it is true that the procuratorate to your senior law reporter disclosed, please publicly inform the disclosure time, place and main content.) The second one is in your blog. In 2009, the director had sex with one of the leading actresses in the TV show, and in this connection, I and hundreds of millions of netizens have no misunderstandings or objections to the nature of the so-called "sex" you mentioned above, please do not reiterate that you refer only to working relationship and eating relationship. Sixth: See my previous reply. (In response to Yeking's tenth article: As you also have a human function, you will have sex with the opposite sex, there is no ambiguity.) The ambiguity is that your message comes from the disclosure of the procuratorial organ, I do not know whether your father is the "Li Gang" of the Procuratorate, it is not clear whether the specific job functions of the prosecutor's office specifically disclose similar who who "sex" and so is false news, I only know that speech is to rely on evidence, you and the disclosure of the procuratorial organs of your evidence? Seventh article: Hebei Legal article is not my contribution, is they reproduced, this matter you can ask this newspaper outreach department and Hebei Legal report. This passage from the Chaoyang Procuratorate of the case of the draft "well-known directors were gang-gang, reason only for extramarital affairs", the previous reply has said, here do not repeat. (in response to Yeking accused of the 11th article: third, you then in the Hebei Legal report publicly published entitled "Idol drama Director because of the affair with the actor was beaten violently," the woman's husband was sued "wrote again:" The prosecutor said that because of the irresponsible family, the indulgence of emotional life, the victim (obviously refers to me) not only was beaten, lost property , but also led to the misfortune of two families! How！ Which prosecutor in this paragraph is speaking? Eighth: This source is indeed the procuratorial organ, what is taboo? (in response to Yeking accused of the 13th article: Shortly thereafter, 2011 1 17th, the Beijing television station Green less channel, and to "Entertainment circle when, director Yeking admitted to be hit" as the title of the program, the host confuse use the words of the ridiculous, as if I became the defendant, and reiterated that the source of the information is disclosed by the procuratorial organs, And then also dedicated on-site phone interview with legal reporter Yuje, Yuje also no taboo said this message from the procuratorial organs. Nineth: About the Beijing Youth column interview, when the director called to inquire why the directors were hit one thing can be attention, is not hype, I told each other, not hype, this may not be significant, but because the micro-blog is not said to beWhich director, may the public curiosity lead to their attention. (response Yeking accused of the 14th article: and openly stated that his first time micro-bo blasting material deliberately did not explicitly put forward the name of the specific director, is to use the curiosity of netizens, so as to arouse the audience greater fun!) Listen, this is how heinous speech, as a senior political and political journalist, even ignore their professional ethics, not to do justice, but to the public to create entertainment gossip and fun. And again openly hit the procuratorial organ disclosure. Tenth: No mention of which director's name is for reasons of prudence, if Fourier think I should mention his name can count as I value "their professional ethics words", next time I will pay attention. In addition, thanks to Fourier's expectations of journalists, but please do not blame others for their professional ethics, do their most important. (response Yeking accused of the 14th article: and openly stated that his first time micro-bo blasting material deliberately did not explicitly put forward the name of the specific director, is to use the curiosity of netizens, so as to arouse the audience greater fun!) Listen, this is how heinous speech, as a senior political and political journalist, even ignore their professional ethics, not to do justice, but to the public to create entertainment gossip and fun. And again openly hit the procuratorial organ disclosure. 11th: Nothing to do with me, do not respond. (In response to the Yeking director accused of the 15th article: Then, 2011 1 31st, the Beijing Legal Evening News, a reporter named Lin published an article and its childish and ridiculous article, and just selected in the year 30 ago, its intentions how good bitter! "In order to verify the matter, the reporter found an indictment of the Chaoyang Procuratorate," the paper said. The indictment clearly records that the victim is Yeh-kyung.　　The details stated in the indictment are in full agreement with the details of the manuscript issued by the Procuratorate ... 12th: It has nothing to do with me, do not respond. (In response to the Yeking director accused of the 16th article: () The prosecution time for the case is December 16, 2010. However, the inconsistency with Yeking is that it is not "rotten" to instruct the attacker to pay. Pay a 36-year-old this year, is a real estate brokerage company's legal representative. The company specializes in high-end real estate intermediary services, specialized in the face of commercial business, in Zhongguancun and other fields have partners. "Listen, this article is a blatant claim that even prosecutors ' indictments are available. 13th: And I have nothing to do, so do not respond. (In response to Director Yeking 17th: I would like to ask the author of this article, you openly for the criminals, and specifically for the real culprit to explain that he is not "rotten cub"! I don't think you've been a good member of the crime. Criminal Kun is indeed a real estate intermediary "room Bug", he has a few smelly money to hire you, you can for your master to write such as no level, disturb the audio and video of the next three abusive articles?! 14th: Nothing to do with me, do not respond. (In response to the Yeking director accused of the 18th article: After that you a brain-crippled reporter in the article again quoted the procuratorial organ: "The reporter also found Chaoyang Procuratorate'sPublish a section. Among them, the prosecutor wrote a section of the "prosecutor's advice": "because of their irresponsible family, the indulgence of their own emotional life ...." Be cautious about extramarital relationships. "Then you added:" Judging by the prosecutor's tone, Yeking was beaten for having an affair. 15th: Buckle The hat is big enough, said very imposing, worthy of a well-known director, Fourier recently to the judiciary experience life? Unfortunately, it is not the truth. (In response to the Yeking director accused of the 19th article: four, ask, you these reporters are specialized in legal reporting, how even the most basic legal knowledge do not understand it?!) I think you do not understand, more will not be a illiteracy.　　In the face of interest and money, you openly disregard the law and justice, borrow the name of the procuratorial organ, use the power to slander the victim and the family, and steal the name of the newspaper media in your possession .... 16th: The case is disclosed by the Public Prosecutor's Office, involving professional ethics, especially the matter of professional ethics, Fourier to speak carefully. (In response to the Yeking director accused of the 20th article: () the manufacture of the Public Prosecutor's office to disclose false news, so that readers and some unknown truth of the media mistakenly thought to be "Beijing Times" and "Legal Evening News" sent Yuje and other reporters interviewed the procuratorial organs.　　Yuje, as a senior legal journalist, has seriously deviated from the basic professional ethics of the news writer, and you have to explode the so-called celebrity privacy, in the case before the court trial, attempted for criminals ... 17th: My report is in accordance with the Public Prosecutor's official external propaganda channel disclosure of content, "joint undercover Operation" non-existent, "blatant interference with the law of fair trial" naturally cannot talk about. I agree with you on punishing violent crimes. (In response to the Yeking director accused of the 21st article: to reduce the guilt and make a big deal in favor of the perpetrators of public opinion, waiting to create a bad deal against the victims.) You in order to meet their own interests, together secretly operation, completely set the victim's personal injury and damage to my reputation in disregard of the flagrant interference of the law of fair trial, serious violations of the victims of the law to punish violent crimes, the protection of the personal safety of citizens and family children and the right to be inviolable! 18th: Which section of the Criminal Procedure Law do I violate? Violation of the highest law, the highest inspection of what the relevant provisions? The D.A. 's office is not my home, for this matter, I have to say that there is a basis for the use of a word you love "openly", you on the microblog blatantly discredit my reputation, discredit my work ethic, if you say the facts can not prove, you may also stand in the dock. You fight, I fight! (In response to the Yeking director accused of the 22nd article: fabricating facts to slander and infringement of the rights of citizens, is prohibited by our laws.) Your foolish behavior has violated the criminal Procedure Law and the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate's related stipulation! Yuje and other reporters, I believe that people's procuratorate is not your old home open, speech to rely on evidence, if you say the facts can not prove that you will become a tort caseDefendant！ The 19th article: please to Chaoyang Procuratorate outside propaganda department to verify. (In response to the Yeking director accused of the 28th article: My lawyer asked in court today in front of the lawsuit in charge of the Chaoyang Procurator's office surnamed Mao's prosecutor, asked her whether she knew the "Beijing Times" reporter Yuje reported that the Chaoyang Procuratorate disclosed that the victim and the defendant's wife had extramarital affairs, and thus was accused of retaliation and beatings, Mao prosecutors on the spot replied: She never Internet, do not know the situation on the Internet, Chaoyang Procuratorate and her own case never received any reporter interview. 20th: The defendant in the civil action case is not to be tried, but to appear in court. Fourier don't show off limited legal knowledge. (In response to the Yeking director's accusation: In addition, I would like to add that is the content of the 29th article: Senior legal journalist Yuje and other people's practices, not only violated the procuratorial organ's reputation right, but also violated the "Beijing Times" and "Legal Evening News" the right of reputation, more violated the disclosure of untrue cases involved in the right of reputation. You will all be judged as defendants! 21st: A moment ago, the responsibility of the Director of the @ Beijing leaves, the purpose is to clarify the facts, to avoid the unknown truth by the leaf guide masterpiece misleading. Since Fourier many micro-blog, some people post to me and reporters this profession to abuse, not their stoop, to these abuses do not respond, please curse people forgive.