Open standards for social networking

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest stationmaster buy cloud host technology Hall

From a recent blog post exploring social networking, it is clear how people now relish the link between different social networking accounts.

The goal is that distributed social networks will fit with individual users. In the vast expanse of the blogosphere, everyone is a free, open, distributed long tail of the environment. Everyone is a center.

The topic will continue to burn until the end user is satisfied and can control his or her own data. The idea of opening up social networks is hard to resist-unless you're a social-networking operator who has put users on hold.

If the end user of the social networking site has the ability to decide in what way to call each other's relationship, all this debate can be muted. But right now, this part of the control is still in the hands of the people in charge.

We can apply for a user ID to log into multiple systems, but have the same ID of the same person. We have standardized how your identity ID and various content are transformed from one system to another, but nobody really implements this standard--so far.

We set up a standard to let the end user set which tool to use so that the "blog this" button can pass the article over. We call it the Universal "blog this" button. I worked with AOL's people to call for support.

We set up a standard to guide blog posts to your personal blogs, work blogs, group blogs, or social networking blogs. We invented that guiding standard, and the partner was a guy called Lucas Gonze.

But we still have a long way to go to achieve the goal of truly opening up our social networks.

At present, different operators adopt various social network application programming interfaces (Social-networking APIs), we need a way to map these APIs to form a normalized world-let friends, profile pages, Groups and messages can be grouped together and compatible with each other.

We need a way to find people, not just the list of persons provided by the industry. At the moment there are some "missing" services, but the platform's original code has not been opened to the outside, also did not see someone to promote the idea of tracing the search for open.

We tried to do Peoplesdns once. So, not that we haven't tried!

I had dreamed of bringing together the aggregator, bringing the conversation together and bringing the group together. Those opportunities will produce standards. Years ago, we made a standard called "threadsml", which sets out how to link message boards, Live Communications (IM) conversations, e-mail exchanges, and other forms of "string" messages.

All of this shows that many people are trying to standardize social networks.

We all know that the best thing about standards is that there are so many standards in the world. But as Dave Winer says, "The only way to keep a certain approach lasting is to introduce a powerful application that allows market forces to prod a standard." The technology people will not be obedient unless market forces force them to do so. 」

That's what we're trying to do now.