Overseas review: Dynamic view EA Influence industry development behavior like high school students

(compiled/wendy) prior to that, the chief executive, Bobby Kotick, in an interview with the industry magazine Edge Magazine, sent out that EA could not treat employees well, and that their studios were suffocating.　　While EA was quick to retaliate, EA PR Vice President Jeff Brown did not shy away from being asked what to say about it, pointing to the three main games, saying his arrogance would destroy the call of duty.　　Foreign famous game website Gamasutra, Chris Morris, after watching the spat and EA's saliva after the war, argued that such incessant bickering hindered the development of the game industry. In the United States, politicians are despised for their long quarrels, a party that spends so much time arguing with another party, and the party that is committed to keeping the country running smoothly has to stop to deal with these quarrels.　　Now as America's mid-term elections approach, the two big video-game giants are starting to quarrel with each other as a party, to show disgust. It's normal for every industry to compete, for example, you can't see Wal-Mart CEO Mike Duke at a party hosted by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. But verbal attacks are rare, on the contrary, if a company wants to make a fool of a company, it will launch a new product by price war or surprise. And in the game world, big companies want to make things bigger and better.　　In the short history of the gaming industry, this is a critical moment, and the abuse of the past few days has been frustrating and confusing. Video games will face the biggest challenge of all time in October, with several major entertainment industries jointly opposed to California State's recent "restrictions on the sale of extreme violence" regulations, which focus on regulation across the industry – which could destroy the industry's bottom line and have an impact on other entertainment industries,　　Two of the largest independent publishers in the video game industry can't shut up at this time?　　EA and the dynamic view of the performance this time is not like two multinational entertainment companies, like a pair of high school students, competing with the rest of the class to show off how stupid their behavior. At the same time, the media played the role of mob, shouting "fight, fight", and Bobby Kotick and Jeff Brown knew clearly that no editor could tolerate either side falling behind, so they became more and more noisy. I also understand that because my colleagues around me have been debating whether to prepare more articles for an escalating quarrel.　　In fact, rarely see senior management directly into the quarrel, this quarrel is useless, and ultimately will only hinder the development of the industry.　　EA and video are just a few trivial things, for the following three things: two companies have lost talented game developers, and developers into each other's company.　　Two companies, once the industry leader, are reluctant to carry the title of the industry's second-largest publisher.　　All know that the fight for the first place will last for a long time, and any opportunity to point out the other's weaknesses will not be spared. There is no doubt that repeated quarrels only bring more jokes, and other gaming companies and other industries are looking at the joke, and the fighting in the industry seems to continue for some time, becoming the focus of gossip. (Edit/Ming)