Pro-ho brand urine is exposed "inside" blade manufacturers said no compensation

Mr Wu recently bought a pack of kiss-and-tag babies in the supermarket, and when they changed their diapers, they found a blade hidden inside. Mr. Wu was surprised that he contacted the manufacturer and said that the blade appeared to have nothing to do with the production process. Ju Yongping, a prominent lawyer, said Mr. Wu could identify the blades through a third-party professional body. Parent: How do you scratch a child? Mr. Wu introduced, he bought is Fujian Jinjiang production of the pro-ho brand urine is not wet, blade is the general market common razor blades, about 3 centimeters long, less than 1 centimeters wide. Although found that the position of the blade is not wet outside, and will not have direct contact with the skin of the child, but Mr Wu is still very worried, "it was three or four o'clock in the afternoon, so saw the blade." If you do not find early to change to the child, I am afraid the child to move, the blade will still pierce the outer layer of urine cloth, and even scratches the child. "At that time was entrusted by the brother-in-law to the nephew to change the urine not to wet the Liang first thought is someone in the supermarket to engage in the mischief, but then she carefully checked the urine is not wet the outermost layer of cloth, found that the cloth are intact," since the outer layer is not tattered place, it is only possible to be put into the production time. " Trabecula speculated. Manufacturers: Not from the production process after Mr. Wu through the supermarket contact the factory after the sale of personnel, after the door-to-door inspection of the problem products, the conclusion is that the blade and their production process, "they also questioned whether the blade I deliberately put in." "The reporter contacted the manufacturer, who said that they are now fully automated production, no workers will be directly exposed to the products on the assembly line, the machine does not use blades as parts, so they judge the blade is not derived from the production process, plus the blade did not cause harm, they are not prepared to pay Mr. Wu compensation. Lawyer: can find the Quality Supervision Bureau of Guangdong Datong law firm Ju Yongping lawyer said that Mr. Wu encountered this situation is a civil evidence of the difficulties of proof. Under the principle of "who advocates the proof", if Mr. Wu is willing to bear the test fee, he can inspect the problem products through the professional institutions of the third party, such as the Quality Supervision Bureau. As long as it can be confirmed that the blade is mixed in the production process, you can claim to the manufacturer. New Fast 315 consumer complaints no place to accept? The damage to the rights. In fact, every day is 315, right on your side. You can call the New Express News hotline 87776333 complaints, or use the Micro-blog @ New Fast 315 to provide clues, we will be your complaints to investigate, as soon as possible to help you solve the problem.