Product assistants ' thinking about work products and users

I feel the time is really very fast, especially when you have a paycheck every month, it seems that all the time around suddenly become a lot shorter. I once heard a colleague elder brother said, a person over 35 years old, will feel the year after year is very fast. Of course, I'm not 30 years old yet, but I've already felt one months before I get to work.

Think I have been working for four months, unconsciously, the university seems to have left me, as if I have not experienced the life of the school for a long time, and even I seem to have forgotten what we usually do in school after class. And now occasionally back to a school, and suddenly feel that they are not in the inflow, see the younger brother to learn the pace of life of the younger sisters is too slow, too comfortable. Unfortunately, I have no. Fortunately, God closed the door to my school and opened a door for me to work. Go where not to go, different stages of life is to take different roads, experience different life, enjoy different pleasures.

The last time I wrote a work diary, it should be more than three months. Well, then tell me about the two months of working life.

Remember at the beginning of the February I wrote an article called Internship Assistant-a rookie puzzle. said that he had encountered a "puzzle" in his work. Do not know what to do after completing the task assigned by the leader, have to do something on the Internet, do some related supplement. Not long afterwards, I have solved! Because if you want to use a word to describe the days after, it is really "how a busy word!"

February 20 department responsible for the product officially online, daily monitoring site data has become my daily breakfast. At first the data were messy and the sources were very complex. Remember that the most fulfilling thing was to solve the CNZZ data problem for the company, because the product was online, but not even a statistical tool, Bi is said to wait 10 days before the development of the completion. So I went to the project owner to propose, the night of the CNZZ installed. This action was later found to be valuable because it found that there were problems with the BI data that was developed later.

One of the company's products ready to do 2-phase optimization, in fact, and redo a almost no difference, from product architecture, to page adjustments, and then to the development of the program, seems to be new. Just look at the page and the current online version of the old is totally not like a mother born. As a small member of the product Department, drawing prototypes has become my primary job every day. Every day with the Department of the Senate sitting in the conference room painting one day, finished painting and then changed, finished painting, finished painting and then changed

I have been thinking, whether this thing is in advance to think of the good, or the edge to think. has not yet been solved.

Because of this, my data daily work was transferred to an operating classmate to do.

After this period of time product prototype work, gave me a lot of inspiration. Why do we change the prototype, so as to reduce the efficiency, but also increase the cost of labor. Behind the art and development of the students have been impatient, because the expected June new products will be online, if we can not complete the prototype design on time, they will be stripped shortened duration, so overtime is inevitable. First of all, our product prototype is divided into three people to design, of course, if you want to count my words is four people, but I was a need to do not have to move the brain. In fact, I also participated in a number of things in the design, one is to share with the predecessors, but want to verify the feasibility of their own ideas, but ultimately, whether good or bad is only as a reference version of predecessors. Generally speaking in this period of products or there are a few of my wisdom, but can only see a shadow, has lost my original mind soul. As the saying goes, a monk carrying water to eat, two monks to eat, three monks have no water to eat. This is what our product looks like. Product users are divided into two categories, a person to do a user, a person to do B-class users, the last one to do the home page and public pages to interspersed two of people's design, so that the two can perfect docking. However, the fact is not the case, category A users and B users can not be fully docking, even in some features or details have not reached a consensus, or even disputes. This is to remind me of a word: the product is a person. This sentence in the end how to understand, for the expert advice.

There is also a place that makes me think for a long while, and it is a place where I disagree with my predecessors. Predecessors for the user to consider very deep, almost all the users will encounter a variety of circumstances she has to consider, the logic of the complexity of our admiration. But I always feel like we're just trying to be considerate of users without any user data, the user may actually encounter all sorts of unexpected situations, but the user will use what behavior to solve this situation we do not know, perhaps we have worked hard to develop the function of no one to use. If there is a need, it can also be completely after the product on-line and obtain the real effective user data in the upgrade after adding the feature.

A logical complexity can often make product designers dizzy products, I think is not a good product. When users face this product, the user behavior of the individual conjecture only two possible, or dizzy, or directly ignore your complex logic, because you run out of the work of the design of the function he did not realize, just according to their usual internet habits to use your products.

Do not think the user is too stupid, because your product is not the first site he has been on, do not think the user is too advanced, because he does not understand your logic.