Property market regulation Shang under the surplus branch of the ban peer sigh unjustifiable

People familiar with the situation said that after the ban, the Pacific Branch has repeatedly dispatched commissioners to the Beijing Communication newspaper reporter Dong Ying the shadow of a new round of policy regulation has darkened the entire property market, and only Mr Li's PCCW has been fortunate enough to seem "out of time". September 30, the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Land issued a notice to restore the Beijing Kai-Xia Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. and the original shareholder, such as Pacific Group land market trading qualifications. This also means that in the last round of real estate control to obtain the most severe punishment in the case of the surplus, the new round of regulation just six months after the start of the release, the Pacific Group to regain the qualification in Beijing.　　Under the strong adjustment of the land department, the ban and the lifting of the qualification of the Pacific Group in Beijing are all shrouded in fog.　　The price of 3 years of hoarding is the cause of the case is Chaoyang District, North 4th. January 23, 2006, after 162 rounds of bidding, Chaoyang District, North 4th, was under Richard Li's Hong Kong surplus Hkust Yan Real Estate Co., Ltd. (hereinafter known as surplus land production) to 510 million yuan.　　And Beijing Kai Xia Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. for the surplus large real estate subsidiary, responsible for the development of the project. However, after getting the plot, the surplus property has been delayed.　　Until the end of August 2009, surplus real estate to 800 million yuan to the land transfer to the Ruian construction industry. And just after the deal has been done for more than half a year, March 11 this year, the Beijing Land Bureau issued a notice that the listed supervision of Beijing Kai Xia Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. Chaoyang District North 4th, because more than the contract agreed to start time, and did not timely application for extension, proposed to the price of the 1% fine,　　The company and its former shareholders, Hong Kong Pacific Century Group and its affiliated companies in the Beijing Land exchange market transactions.　　In accordance with the provisions of the Ministry of Land, for more than the contract agreed to start the development date of one year did not start to develop, can levy land leasing gold under 20% of the land idle fees; idle two years or more of land not developed, the government can reclaim the land use rights of developers free of charge. and 3 years of surplus property, the penalty to be paid is only 1% of the land transfer gold, far below the 20% penalty limit.　　Moreover, the fines paid by the Pacific branch are only "bucket" compared with the transfer proceeds of 800 million yuan.　　At that time, some people in the industry told reporters that because the plot has been transferred and already started, the fine is only a "symbolic" punishment, it is important to stop the company in Beijing to qualify, which is undoubtedly a "fatal" blow to the real estate business.　　However, to the surprise of all parties, only six months later, Beijing Kai-Xia Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. and its club's surplus group was declared "full release". The Land Bureau September 30 announcement is very simple, said "in accordance with the State and the relevant provisions of the city, after research and submitted to the municipal government for approval, from now on to resume the Beijing Kai Xia Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., the original shareholder, such as the unit land market trading qualifications."　　There is no specific explanation for the lifting. In stark contrast to the tracker,Beijing Tai Lung Real estate.　　Due to the price of Non-payment, the auction is not scheduled to sign the land transfer contract, Tai Lung real estate in January this year was resumed the Tianzhu "Land King" plot, not only paid the price of 200 million yuan margin, but also suspended in Beijing to bid for land qualifications, has not been lifted. "Ban filming" before and after the doubt in the news of the ban, Beijing, a large real estate business vice-president told reporters: "The surplus branch of the land of this matter from the ban to the lifting of the release are quite baffling, let people elusive."　　In fact, according to the reporter understand, the surplus branch "hoarding land" should be in the eyes of the relevant departments of Beijing early. In January 2006, the surplus real estate to more than 11,000 yuan/square meters of floor premium to rob the land after the High-profile claim to build high-grade apartments.　　Since then, the whole of 2006, surplus real estate has been trying to change the construction planning, the original planning after several changes, has been involved in the original company executives Lu Qanwei and so on to flee. However, the eventual surplus big real estate, the project underground construction area from 6000 square meters to 17,400 square meters of planning was approved, counted on the replacement of land, the 2006-year Beijing "King", the floor land price successfully reduced to 9279 yuan/square meters.　　After the rehabilitation of the project plan, in 2009, the Beijing Municipal housing construction project postponed the time to July 2009 to December 2011. "At the time, the Beijing municipal government agreed to revise the plan and postpone the construction of the project, which could be said to be a statement in which the authorities did not view the site as idle."　　"The Beijing Big real Estate enterprise vice-president told the Huaxia Times reporter." However, in the 8 months after the transfer project, Beijing Land Bureau issued a ticket, and even the developers to implement a "ban", which in the processing of land developers hoarding incidents are rare. Beijing Real Estate Association, a person in charge to reporters that the housing companies have been known as the industry's "unspoken rules", the Land Bureau of "hoarding" the punishment is nothing but a fine, confiscated plots are very rare, let alone "ban filming." "It's a bit unorthodox to be so deliberately heavy. "And after the recent PCCW ban, an industry insider who has dealings with the Pacific Group has told reporters that after the ban, Mr Li has repeatedly sent commissioners to Beijing to investigate and communicate with government departments," it is indeed very difficult to resolve this matter quickly when regulation is increasingly tense. "　　"The timing of the lifting of the ban is no doubt that the smooth" lifted the ban, so that the group became the "land-hoarding incident," the biggest winner. 2006 Surplus real estate to 510 million Yuan North 4th, Chaoyang District, the transfer to Ruian in 2009, its value has risen to 800 million yuan.　　Surplus real estate only by putting in the land transfer money and only 5.1 million of the fine, net make more than 200 million yuan. It is noteworthy that, in the 1 days prior to the release of the Pacific Century, the Ministry of Land and Housing construction department issued a joint notice, strict land transfer management once again become the focus of the second round of regulation. The notice is clear, the enterprise defaults development land,If the land is idle for one year for its own reasons, it will prohibit the bidding qualification. In such a cusp, "for their own reasons," the land has been idle for 3 years, but the ban was lifted.　　Although the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Land selected a day before national day "low-key" issued a brief announcement, but the ban of the Pacific century is still the industry's concern. Industry analysts said that when the Land Bureau announced the North 4th block, such as 5 cases of idle real estate development land processing advice, only Beijing Kai Xia Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. belongs to "because the enterprise itself is not according to the transfer contract performance", and there was no "ban" time to make provisions, so six months later, "lifting"　　is understandable. However, the above-mentioned Beijing large real estate companies vice-president said that the municipal bureau of Land in the second round of regulation at the beginning of the lifting of the release of the "hoarding" of the company and the Pacific Century Group, "in the timing seems to be a bit indefensible, it is inevitable that people on the strength of the implementation of policy ”