Public comment Network refused to delete the "bad comment" was sued

This report (Trainee reporter Wang Weiwi correspondent Snow Jie) A bad comment, can let a small company is poor. Recently, a wedding company will be the public comment on the court, that the latter two years has been refused to delete a consumer of the company's false negative evaluation, violated its reputation right, the claim for economic loss of 10,000 yuan.　　Yesterday morning, Fengtai court hearing the case. December 2009, Beijing Crystal Love Wedding Company in the public comments on the Internet "encounter" a negative comment. Wedding Company has served a customer with more than 1200 words of comments, detailed described the company to provide the wedding car mess, emcee late, crystal candlestick obsolete and other services.　　In this respect, the wedding company said that after the staff who had served the customer confirmed that the commentary fictitious facts, the company was vilified. Yesterday's trial scene, the wedding company sued, it has been unable to contact with the customer, only several times through the call or interview, and the public comments network operators Shanghai Han Tao Information Consulting Co., Ltd. to communicate, asked it to delete comments, but the other side in nearly two years has not been deleted.　　The move caused a lot of damage to the business reputation of the wedding company. In this respect, the public comment network lawyer said that the purpose of the website is to provide consumers and merchants with a platform for information exchange, to provide consumers with a reflection of the problem of the media. If the merchant thinks the customer evaluation is negative, this can communicate through the website platform, "to withstand the user's comments". If the merchant thinks that the comment is alleged insult slander and so on illegal behavior, also may submit the written application, the website has the professional lawyer to carry on the judgment and the definition, and carries on the corresponding processing. But the wedding company did not provide a written application, nor did it prove that the comments were untrue.　　In conclusion, the public comment network does not constitute a reputation infringement. The present case is still pending further.