Qihoo 360 wins unfair competition case Rising said has appealed

May 10 Afternoon news, according to Qihoo 360, Beijing Xicheng District Court today open trial of strange Tigers sued rising unfair competition case, the court sentenced rising unfair competition and need compensation for Qihoo 200,000 yuan.　　Rising then issued an external statement that has appealed. Qihoo 360 sued the rising company on the grounds that "fabricated facts to unfair competition means malicious attack Qihoo 360 commercial reputation and commodity reputation".　　The case originates from last February rising official website and the client spreads "360 to install the back door article for the user", the article said these backdoor existence huge security hidden danger, the hacker may use this backdoor to steal the user information.　　Qihoo later said the remarks were untrue and claimed damage to the reputation of 360 security products.　　Xicheng District Court today sentenced to the case, that rising behavior constitutes unfair competition, and determine rising immediately stop on Qihoo 360 unfair competition behavior, and in the media issued an apology statement, compensation for odd tiger 200,000 yuan loss. Rising then issued a statement on the matter, said, "as a professional manufacturer of security, the company found that software or vendors have security risks, the responsibility and obligation to the public through the appropriate means to protect the interests of users." The contents of these announcements are notarized by notary office and have legal effect. Rising at the same time that, with the rapid development of the Internet, the enactment and implementation of laws lag behind the reality, resulting in many areas of gray area. The relevant superior departments are unable to punish the acts which endanger the interests of the users according to the existing laws. "Rising choice to the public information, but also the use of media forces to maintain user security and interests of legitimate acts." Rising finally expressed respect for the law, and said that the higher people's Court has been under the procedure to appeal. (Tracy)