Really crazy, or that can make people crazy money

On the New Year's Day, Chiang's Ark of a "Caesar's Caesar, the god of Caesar," brush the circle of friends. Many entrepreneurs were stung by the parable of Chiang's Ark's "venture into a new era of countryside", angrily picking up a pen to fight back. I have also read a number of core arguments for "What do you know about the Internet", or "Jiang Ark, Your history, politics, philosophy teacher died early" counterattack article. Chiang's Ark of pure liberal arts background is expected to do, many people think that "internet" or "entrepreneurship" are in the field of science students, but do not want to admit that the liberal arts students in these things and they enjoy the same judgment ability. Chiang's Ark himself wrote in another post: "People are not accustomed to the literature as a discipline, a history and prospects of the subject." It is like physics, mathematics, in different times to solve different problems, explore different possibilities. "A friend of mine once made an interesting conclusion about such a thing." There is a reproductive segregation between science students in different fields, while liberal arts students and science students do not belong to the same species at all.

But today's internet industry is no longer as dependent on technology as it was when it was first developed, and many entrepreneurs who are not technicians have made significant achievements, such as Lo Zhenyu, such as Ma Yun. To mock the background of the liberal arts of Chiang's Ark does not constitute a strong retort, and the relatively rich life experience of Chiang's Ark and her valuable experiences in her career have been enough to support her in questioning such a social phenomenon. In many cases, pure professional knowledge is often difficult to make a clear judgement in the face of complex social events, and many people rely on their own experience to make judgments that are often fulfilled. Of course, there are many Internet practitioners agree with Jiang's point of view, that Jiang Ark's article for the entrepreneur is a certain warning value. In recent years, by a lot of positive factors, the upsurge of entrepreneurship swept across China. Many young entrepreneurs are open to tens's a-round financing and are only willing to let investors account for 20% of stocks. Many investors are openly criticizing the entrepreneurs for their pride, and they are simply taking investors for granted. These phenomena seem to suggest that there is some sort of bizarre antagonism between entrepreneurs and investors, and that public opinion often blames young entrepreneurs for their arrogance and ignorance.

However, this kind of argument is wronged the entrepreneur. In fact, we are very aware of the fact that in the interaction between entrepreneur and investor, the entrepreneur is in a passive state most of the time, the rhythm of the interaction is firmly in the hands of investors. High-profile new is definitely not a normal, Zuckerberg after all, only one. Many people saw the entrepreneur in front of the young frivolous, but can not see hiding in the deep curtain, carrying the tray of investors slowly stirring the hands of the line. The arrogance of the entrepreneur is merely a deliberate act under a passive hint, showing the prosperity of the entrepreneurial economy to the audience of the whole society, so that more people and capital will continue to rush into the investment circle frantically. Some people think that this kind of performance is meaningless, that no one will pay for such arrogant entrepreneurs, but in fact, investors are not waiting for the farmer, will only quietly wait for the arrival of a good project. Many times, in order to attract more "steed", "Daughter buy Horse Bone" is also necessary means.

Lo Zhenyu once told a classic economics case, the Dutch tulip bubble of the--17 century, in a video called "The Book of Thought". In the eyes of investors, today's entrepreneurs and tulip bulbs, the role of the same, no longer expect the tulip bloom, color and variety in the eyes of investors are naked into the amount of continuous rise. Some people may say that my statement is a stark conspiracy theory, investors certainly do not want bubble economy, after all, if the bubble burst, many investors will suffer huge losses. This is not unreasonable, the vast majority of investors are sure that the entrepreneurial economy can be benign development. I also believe that as individuals, investors are rational and professional, even compassionate and socially responsible, but if we look at investors as a set concept, or, further, directly abstract their actions into the flow of money, we tend to find that money does not show their owner's sanity in the flow, The power of herding is never to be underestimated.

A well-known investor once said that "bubbles are not bubbles before they are shattered". There is a similar expression in economics, "there is a bubble in any economic entity". But unlike the tulip bulbs, the entrepreneurial economy buys and sells goods that are the future of the young, and cannot tolerate our carelessness. China is still far from forming a mature entrepreneurial culture and a good social security system, the opportunity cost of the entire younger generation is very high, and once the bubble burst, will have an irreversible impact on the life of many entrepreneurs, or even destroy a generation of confidence in entrepreneurship. This is unacceptable to us. Really crazy, not entrepreneurs, not investors, but to make people crazy money.